Re: [PATCH v10 00/35] kmemcg shrinkers

Andrew Morton
2013-06-06T07:47:27Z

On Thu, 6 Jun 2013 11:37:03 +0400 Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com> wrote:

> On 06/06/2013 11:18 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > The shrinker stuff seems sensible and straightforward and I expect we
> > can proceed with that at the normal pace. The memcg changes struck me
> > as being hairy as hell and I'd really like to see the other memcg
> > people go through it carefully.
> >
> > Of course, "new series" doesn't give you an easily accessible tree to
> > target. I could drop it all again to give you a clean shot at
> > tomorrow's -next?
> If you just keep them on top (not really sure how hard it is for you), I
> can just remove them all and apply a new series on top.

I could do that but then anyone else who wants to test the code has to
do the same thing. Dropping them out of -next does seem the clean
approach.

We still need to work out what to do with
memcg-debugging-facility-to-access-dangling-memcgs.patch btw. See
other email.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: email@kvack.org