From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/11] per-cgroup cpu-stat Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 17:06:37 -0700 Message-ID: <20130607000637.GT5045@htj.dyndns.org> References: <1369825402-31046-1-git-send-email-glommer@openvz.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=sao2J3J9EG2fmEAm5Z/OvdQu+SBW3O6TmBb/WmG/3jg=; b=xswtiN0UAXB0E5L8HCakJ7T6Z1CL9BtLwOt+Ehhbxgbcl0KOGrIuggQ7ld0nRFXRJ0 d/hvT3koqks7nvkuQA+znkOmjLO3y0FzUzC/k/heQMZMNkld6h5JAqn/jPz/zdeq9uwq WFTKPAOMRkcZGEodbeX/yYY5ym8JeGc8C9UFA095n2Ydg4VLBqOw9CaxdRpb60+GACtq tB4O79o2Vy7pa45StRIejBePnXyIA8KgQYf/bSOh0KFNkjQ6jjjlRIzfgxg+IMpxkV+C NDIWwZd7RH/F9a4oT9zZAQn1sn49lFmDKi9Qx7Tw83wIE5GqalQAt+zYmbYaaXnm0kht QmEA== Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1369825402-31046-1-git-send-email-glommer-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Glauber Costa Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Paul Turner , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Frederic Weisbecker , devel-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 03:03:11PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote: > I am coming again with this series, hoping this is a better time for you all to > look at it. > > I am *not* going as far as marking cpuacct deprecated, because I think it > deserves a special discussion (even though my position in this matter is widely > known), but all the infrastructure to make it happen is here. But after this, > it should be a matter of setting a flag (or not). Things look generally good to me upto patch 6. Maybe we can combine "adding cpuacct stats to cpu" and "re-using schedstats" but no strong opinion. Peter, what do you think? Thanks. -- tejun