From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] cpuset: remove async hotplug propagation work Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2013 08:47:57 -0700 Message-ID: <20130609154757.GC2835@htj.dyndns.org> References: <51B4475A.8030509@huawei.com> <51B44787.2030601@huawei.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=sjv+loOfoLi8bpJH7DhCnG8xI+AJe1mpZa0fKTsbxeI=; b=J26poS23mjJF/sqq/SqmDIeFnf8uNzUEehgkGe7nsFrRLN5jI6XdF1CxCYLcEtJ82X l5AJ4HkKpuE2VZYuMQ6TZu4GPJlfZimUJlvBlvFHESnZxlJh3si6l3OLDUINlBCrjoMZ IY8I+cCAAI0FK7noGO4H3/rZxb4ZuuhBbewy65shCZ5gTgOHwwwkFdkSHdN/wB45RUyG 8VAwI0G0GpKRkYWr3OvEz/BL8WV/O11KL99OiLFojupfjz3vm6CizdIhOJJODfu/n7R7 E6KGw5QFpUpTEGADsEWW1yD9c6RZONQMznaHaGPpz5FoIa1X0Q9cVHSDOTCEHSBbjf5V e+ZA== Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51B44787.2030601-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Li Zefan Cc: Cgroups , Containers , LKML On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 05:14:47PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote: > As we can drop rcu read lock while iterating cgroup hierarchy, > we don't have to do propagation asynchronously via workqueue. > > Signed-off-by: Li Zefan Applied 1-2 to cgroup/for-3.11-cpuset. Thanks! -- tejun