From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Glauber Costa Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/9] memcg: use css_get/put when charging/uncharging kmem Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 14:56:13 +0400 Message-ID: <20130614105611.GA4292@localhost.localdomain> References: <51B98D17.2050902@huawei.com> <20130613155319.GJ23070@dhcp22.suse.cz> <51BA6F34.30001@huawei.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=F9aut/mM1zHoWHlJPTd8ToyZr8tY2DfY3cWf/frFU14=; b=O4Jw1h2Nul1SEQqqKVvp+pCl/okQbRr6lHSWa1nEd5th/d4tD44XQ2k5lD0vzR2e/+ AMjVA96VyXkTAlNHioccOzXSNfuJxpS1NXTuhWVmwqGuG2YN6tkgpAekhGNxoHdWLDAX 98t0ea/0Vcf56Zodk6yaRwYBOWDNljCMlNnfHb++qRHFpiH2+kV9BBqFkyYBZ0fbN7iP /Nlxgt0oYdSpfg9Pvm9Uf9rjAWAJog1dJFmfBjPwViO+QuzPF4xJvRgmtEnTXaEmolxv LtsqDceTP3eFaHDuAnZSx5mchRY2DGZRUR32oaDl1jx1g8TnYUOS5bxvxNP5jE/KKmmf FIxw== Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51BA6F34.30001@huawei.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Li Zefan Cc: Michal Hocko , Tejun Heo , Glauber Costa , Johannes Weiner , LKML , cgroups , linux-mm@kvack.org, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 09:17:40AM +0800, Li Zefan wrote: > >> static void memcg_kmem_mark_dead(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) > >> { > >> + /* > >> + * We need to call css_get() first, because memcg_uncharge_kmem() > >> + * will call css_put() if it sees the memcg is dead. > >> + */ > >> + smb_wmb(); > >> if (test_bit(KMEM_ACCOUNTED_ACTIVE, &memcg->kmem_account_flags)) > >> set_bit(KMEM_ACCOUNTED_DEAD, &memcg->kmem_account_flags); > > > > I do not feel strongly about that but maybe open coding this in > > mem_cgroup_css_offline would be even better. There is only single caller > > and there is smaller chance somebody will use the function incorrectly > > later on. > > > > So I leave the decision on you because this doesn't matter much. > > > > Yeah, it should go away soon. I'll post a patch after this patchset gets > merged into -mm tree and then we can discuss there. I don't care if it is open coded or not. If there is any strong preference from anyone on this matter, feel free to change it. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org