From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Serge Hallyn Subject: Re: [OFFLIST] status of devcg Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 14:12:06 -0500 Message-ID: <20130711191206.GA2149@ac100> References: <20130710184655.GB16979@mtj.dyndns.org> <20130710195001.GW14011@redhat.com> <20130711093405.GC2377@redhat.com> <20130711155106.GB9229@mtj.dyndns.org> <20130711160532.GA14909@ac100> <20130711171037.GB10195@mtj.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130711171037.GB10195-9pTldWuhBndy/B6EtB590w@public.gmane.org> Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Tejun Heo Cc: "Daniel P. Berrange" , containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, Kay Sievers , Lennart Poettering , cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org Quoting Tejun Heo (tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org): > Hello, > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:05:32AM -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: > > Is there something in particular you want to accomplish for which the > > current rules do not suffice? > > Yeah, a cgroup changing its rules affecting the descendants > irreversibly, which is nasty and makes it tricky to implement > automation on top or implement proper cgroup migration, so I asked > Aristeu whether he could implement cleaner behavior for unified > hierarchy. Before I respond to that, could you please tell me precisely what you mean by 'unified hierarchy'? I thought it just meant all controllers composed into one mount. Maybe it means something else. -serge