From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Serge Hallyn Subject: Re: Single process controlling all cgroups sounds like looking in right direction but wrong solution. Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 07:32:16 -0500 Message-ID: <20130715123216.GA5663@sergelap> References: <20130715032551.GA3046@ac100> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Peter Dolding Cc: tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Quoting Peter Dolding (oiaohm-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org): > I followed the Maintainers File. https://www.kernel.org/doc/linux/MAINTAINERS > CONTROL GROUPS (CGROUPS) > M: Paul Menage > M: Li Zefan > L: containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Odd, my version has L: containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org L: cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org The cgroups entry was added in November 2011 according to git-blame. I don't know why the kernel.org version is so old. Still I think that should be patched to remove containers@. I originally objected to the cgroup@ list creation, but since I do not believe the relevant cgroup folks read the containers@ list any more, I don't think containers@ should be listed - certainly not first. > S: Maintained > F: include/linux/cgroup* > F: kernel/cgroup* > F: mm/*cgroup* > > > Apparently by your response this might be a bit out of date. I just read > lwm and *Tejun Heo is not even as a main maintainer. Listed as a sub part > maintainer. By the maintainers file discussions should be in * > containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org where I sent this. > > Tejun Heo please inform if this is still correct. Its either update this > or tell lwn.net to get your title correct in future. > > Serge I am trying to follow policy that is why I posted here in the first > place. That sounds unnecessarily defensive - I wasn't complaining, just trying to help your email get to where it would be best discussed :) Sorry that it involves an extra step (resending), but I didn't want to simply reply cc:ing cgroups@, as the email thread tends to get funky that way. -serge