From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCHSET v2 cgroup/for-3.12] cgroup: make cgroup_event specific to memcg Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 08:31:01 -0400 Message-ID: <20130823123101.GA10322@mtj.dyndns.org> References: <1376582550-12548-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <20130821201239.GB2436@htj.dyndns.org> <5216DA6F.3080508@huawei.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=/LPRPk7hmWFQjZA3tAQZbNX9FbM4UryK6Br9cO4Sr10=; b=sN+x99K6pRklzrHglomBTQ7pR3NAM2vT8rK8H8zK1hsg2skxBmDyiYuBc6QdIF2LdJ Du0/1Ri9xszFdONwCHQP1YAaCZFCZOzycszhARgf497CgfT+ev6Xz7KlbCqXtevPbzrg OGgYGUcwuDjTqKwznSxUor79czp68zddP1uVeP8UWJ2tNb6Y5VrPjM6xyWrhyiMTLER4 AZVRJlpZmd7C+8nAb4ErzMkF0kiQJMmZhMSWZlXKoB+6xM7hs0JOTTxUDDkPDfnAox+G mzLqkeXSuS/AGCVFG6TmEEK1UR9IfWPyfYvkBMvm4ZvRdOd9R3RBf5t00qJc5fBHYXs6 /H+A== Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5216DA6F.3080508-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Li Zefan Cc: mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org, hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org, cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Hello, On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 11:43:43AM +0800, Li Zefan wrote: > On 2013/8/22 4:12, Tejun Heo wrote: > > Li, Michal, ping. > > I'm fine with the patchset. Feel free to add my acks. :) Michal, given that these changes are mostly just moving things around but can cause headaches between cgroup and memcg trees, I think it could be better to push it out in this cycle. It's late but I think it's niche enough to push for the coming merge window. What do you think? If you agree, how should this be routed? Thanks. -- tejun