From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] percpu counter: cast this_cpu_sub() adjustment Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 05:04:29 -0700 Message-ID: <20131027050429.7fcc2ed5.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <1382859876-28196-1-git-send-email-gthelen@google.com> <1382859876-28196-3-git-send-email-gthelen@google.com> <20131027112255.GB14934@mtj.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20131027112255.GB14934@mtj.dyndns.org> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Tejun Heo Cc: Greg Thelen , Christoph Lameter , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Johannes Weiner , Michal Hocko , Balbir Singh , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , handai.szj@taobao.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org On Sun, 27 Oct 2013 07:22:55 -0400 Tejun Heo wrote: > We probably want to cc stable for this and the next one. How should > these be routed? I can take these through percpu tree or mm works > too. Either way, it'd be best to route them together. Yes, all three look like -stable material to me. I'll grab them later in the week if you haven't ;) The names of the first two patches distress me. They rather clearly assert that the code affects percpu_counter.[ch], but that is not the case. Massaging is needed to fix that up. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org