From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Serge Hallyn Subject: Re: [lxc-devel] cgroup management daemon Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 09:54:37 -0600 Message-ID: <20131204155437.GA29008@sergelap> References: <20131125224335.GA15481@mail.hallyn.com> <20131203134506.GG8277@htj.dyndns.org> <20131204000344.GB24968@sergelap> <20131204012416.GY8277@htj.dyndns.org> <20131204023151.GA12376@sergelap> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Tim Hockin Cc: Tejun Heo , "Serge E. Hallyn" , =?iso-8859-1?Q?St=E9phane?= Graber , Victor Marmol , Rohit Jnagal , lxc-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org Quoting Tim Hockin (thockin-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org): > If this daemon works as advertised, we will explore moving all write > traffic to use it. I still have concerns that this can't handle read > traffic at the scale we need. > > Tejun, I am not sure why chown came back into the conversation. This > is a replacement for that. Because the daemon is chowning directories and files. That's how the daemon decides whether clients have access. -serge