From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [lxc-devel] cgroup management daemon Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 18:06:32 -0500 Message-ID: <20131204230632.GA10785@mtj.dyndns.org> References: <20131125224335.GA15481@mail.hallyn.com> <20131203134506.GG8277@htj.dyndns.org> <20131204000344.GB24968@sergelap> <20131204012416.GY8277@htj.dyndns.org> <20131204023151.GA12376@sergelap> <20131204155437.GA29008@sergelap> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=QvDRWULCnUquijEAWJyt/m1uEPRFoHEjJLmrRabnsYo=; b=Lr5gmZdXbqXdfd8aElTCoETAtIqohW+cqWcfsVhAuYfntR4VNHM5HarHckNi5dP5WU T7vDsm7GSFkK1jBpgBM9Q4HG1GaXHL1SIq9YHuu3z9zcSsIXcAiQFA4saVtfc4wH9TaP seOLUBF/IevAap4zn6D2h+3DE/K+5D1pAb4FN+0MblKjjPI/kLmPS3NmmkEK0Tew4YYo KljqfLgm1Yvb+p4b70kcqUl3pCS9LCHQwtYWPbSyDUB00/R0LR3YfP0EBK8rCnuSyQCf ikZpnF3yR2kannZ+aKG4eUJdQS95nRvWd3KooRQrTZts2JHyGWOcPOJUd8EjlLRsb2Bu Kc8w== Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131204155437.GA29008@sergelap> Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Serge Hallyn Cc: Tim Hockin , "Serge E. Hallyn" , =?iso-8859-1?Q?St=E9phane?= Graber , Victor Marmol , Rohit Jnagal , lxc-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 09:54:37AM -0600, Serge Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Tim Hockin (thockin-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org): > > If this daemon works as advertised, we will explore moving all write > > traffic to use it. I still have concerns that this can't handle read > > traffic at the scale we need. > > > > Tejun, I am not sure why chown came back into the conversation. This > > is a replacement for that. > > Because the daemon is chowning directories and files. That's how > the daemon decides whether clients have access. Ah, okay, so the manager is just using filesystem metadata for bookkeeping. That should be fine. Please note that cgroup filesystem also supports xattr and AFAIK systemd is already making use of it. Thanks. -- tejun