From: Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: Zefan Li <lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Cgroups <cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup: remove redundant variable in cgroup_mount()
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 13:12:31 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140920171231.GB3681@htj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <541D2366.2020107-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Hello, Li.
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 02:49:10PM +0800, Zefan Li wrote:
> Both pinned_sb and new_sb indicate if a new superblock is needed,
> so we can just remove new_sb.
>
> Note now we must check if kernfs_tryget_sb() returns NULL, because
> when it returns NULL, kernfs_mount() may still re-use an existing
> superblock, which is just allocated by another concurent mount.
>
> Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> Signed-off-by: Zefan Li <lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Ah, this is so much better. Thanks for doing this. Applied to
cgroup/for-3.18.
> ---
>
> Hi Tejun,
>
> I think you wanted to see the @new_sb argument removed from kernfs_mount(),
> but it's also used in debugfs and we can't use kernfs_tryget_sb() to
> replace the new_sb check.
Bummer, someday. :)
Thanks.
--
tejun
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-20 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-20 6:49 [PATCH] cgroup: remove redundant variable in cgroup_mount() Zefan Li
[not found] ` <541D2366.2020107-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-20 17:12 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140920171231.GB3681@htj.dyndns.org \
--to=tj-dgejt+ai2ygdnm+yrofe0a@public.gmane.org \
--cc=cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).