* [PATCH v4 1/3] sched: fix confusing PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS constant
@ 2014-09-25 1:40 Zefan Li
[not found] ` <54237281.5020308-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Zefan Li @ 2014-09-25 1:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tejun Heo
Cc: LKML, Cgroups, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Miao Xie, Kees Cook,
Tetsuo Handa, David Rientjes
Commit 1d4457f99928 ("sched: move no_new_privs into new atomic flags")
defined PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS as hexadecimal value, but it is confusing
because it is used as bit number. Redefine it as decimal bit number.
Note this changes the bit position of PFA_NOW_NEW_PRIVS from 1 to 0.
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Miao Xie <miaox-BthXqXjhjHXQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel-JPay3/Yim36HaxMnTkn67Xf5DAMn2ifp@public.gmane.org>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
[ lizf: slightly modified subject and changelog ]
Signed-off-by: Zefan Li <lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 5c2c885..4557765 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1957,7 +1957,7 @@ static inline void memalloc_noio_restore(unsigned int flags)
}
/* Per-process atomic flags. */
-#define PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS 0x00000001 /* May not gain new privileges. */
+#define PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS 0 /* May not gain new privileges. */
static inline bool task_no_new_privs(struct task_struct *p)
{
--
1.8.0.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 2/3] sched: add macros to define bitops for task atomic flags
[not found] ` <54237281.5020308-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
@ 2014-09-25 1:40 ` Zefan Li
2014-09-25 1:41 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] cpuset: PF_SPREAD_PAGE and PF_SPREAD_SLAB should be " Zefan Li
2014-09-25 2:17 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] sched: fix confusing PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS constant Tejun Heo
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Zefan Li @ 2014-09-25 1:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tejun Heo
Cc: LKML, Cgroups, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Miao Xie, Kees Cook,
Tetsuo Handa, David Rientjes
This will simplify code when we add new flags.
v3:
- Kees pointed out that no_new_privs should never be cleared, so we
shouldn't define task_clear_no_new_privs(). we define 3 macros instead
of a single one.
v2:
- updated scripts/tags.sh, suggested by Peter
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Miao Xie <miaox-BthXqXjhjHXQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel-JPay3/Yim36HaxMnTkn67Xf5DAMn2ifp@public.gmane.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
Signed-off-by: Zefan Li <lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 21 ++++++++++++---------
scripts/tags.sh | 6 ++++++
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 4557765..5630763 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1959,15 +1959,18 @@ static inline void memalloc_noio_restore(unsigned int flags)
/* Per-process atomic flags. */
#define PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS 0 /* May not gain new privileges. */
-static inline bool task_no_new_privs(struct task_struct *p)
-{
- return test_bit(PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS, &p->atomic_flags);
-}
-
-static inline void task_set_no_new_privs(struct task_struct *p)
-{
- set_bit(PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS, &p->atomic_flags);
-}
+#define TASK_PFA_TEST(name, func) \
+ static inline bool task_##func(struct task_struct *p) \
+ { return test_bit(PFA_##name, &p->atomic_flags); }
+#define TASK_PFA_SET(name, func) \
+ static inline void task_set_##func(struct task_struct *p) \
+ { set_bit(PFA_##name, &p->atomic_flags); }
+#define TASK_PFA_CLEAR(name, func) \
+ static inline void task_clear_##func(struct task_struct *p) \
+ { clear_bit(PFA_##name, &p->atomic_flags); }
+
+TASK_PFA_TEST(NO_NEW_PRIVS, no_new_privs)
+TASK_PFA_SET(NO_NEW_PRIVS, no_new_privs)
/*
* task->jobctl flags
diff --git a/scripts/tags.sh b/scripts/tags.sh
index cbfd269..293828b 100755
--- a/scripts/tags.sh
+++ b/scripts/tags.sh
@@ -197,6 +197,9 @@ exuberant()
--regex-c++='/SETPCGFLAG\(([^,)]*).*/SetPageCgroup\1/' \
--regex-c++='/CLEARPCGFLAG\(([^,)]*).*/ClearPageCgroup\1/' \
--regex-c++='/TESTCLEARPCGFLAG\(([^,)]*).*/TestClearPageCgroup\1/' \
+ --regex-c++='/TASK_PFA_TEST\([^,]*,\s*([^)]*)\)/task_\1/' \
+ --regex-c++='/TASK_PFA_SET\([^,]*,\s*([^)]*)\)/task_set_\1/' \
+ --regex-c++='/TASK_PFA_CLEAR\([^,]*,\s*([^)]*)\)/task_clear_\1/'\
--regex-c='/PCI_OP_READ\((\w*).*[1-4]\)/pci_bus_read_config_\1/' \
--regex-c='/PCI_OP_WRITE\((\w*).*[1-4]\)/pci_bus_write_config_\1/' \
--regex-c='/DEFINE_(MUTEX|SEMAPHORE|SPINLOCK)\((\w*)/\2/v/' \
@@ -260,6 +263,9 @@ emacs()
--regex='/SETPCGFLAG\(([^,)]*).*/SetPageCgroup\1/' \
--regex='/CLEARPCGFLAG\(([^,)]*).*/ClearPageCgroup\1/' \
--regex='/TESTCLEARPCGFLAG\(([^,)]*).*/TestClearPageCgroup\1/' \
+ --regex='/TASK_PFA_TEST\([^,]*,\s*([^)]*)\)/task_\1/' \
+ --regex='/TASK_PFA_SET\([^,]*,\s*([^)]*)\)/task_set_\1/' \
+ --regex='/TASK_PFA_CLEAR\([^,]*,\s*([^)]*)\)/task_clear_\1/' \
--regex='/_PE(\([^,)]*\).*/PEVENT_ERRNO__\1/' \
--regex='/PCI_OP_READ(\([a-z]*[a-z]\).*[1-4])/pci_bus_read_config_\1/' \
--regex='/PCI_OP_WRITE(\([a-z]*[a-z]\).*[1-4])/pci_bus_write_config_\1/'\
--
1.8.0.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 3/3] cpuset: PF_SPREAD_PAGE and PF_SPREAD_SLAB should be atomic flags
[not found] ` <54237281.5020308-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-25 1:40 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] sched: add macros to define bitops for task atomic flags Zefan Li
@ 2014-09-25 1:41 ` Zefan Li
2014-09-25 2:17 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] sched: fix confusing PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS constant Tejun Heo
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Zefan Li @ 2014-09-25 1:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tejun Heo
Cc: LKML, Cgroups, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Miao Xie, Kees Cook,
Tetsuo Handa, David Rientjes
When we change cpuset.memory_spread_{page,slab}, cpuset will flip
PF_SPREAD_{PAGE,SLAB} bit of tsk->flags for each task in that cpuset.
This should be done using atomic bitops, but currently we don't,
which is broken.
Tetsuo reported a hard-to-reproduce kernel crash on RHEL6, which happened
when one thread tried to clear PF_USED_MATH while at the same time another
thread tried to flip PF_SPREAD_PAGE/PF_SPREAD_SLAB. They both operate on
the same task.
Here's the full report:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/19/230
To fix this, we make PF_SPREAD_PAGE and PF_SPREAD_SLAB atomic flags.
v4:
- updated mm/slab.c. (Fengguang Wu)
- updated Documentation.
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Miao Xie <miaox-BthXqXjhjHXQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
Fixes: 950592f7b991 ("cpusets: update tasks' page/slab spread flags in time")
Cc: <stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org> # 2.6.31+
Reported-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel-JPay3/Yim36HaxMnTkn67Xf5DAMn2ifp@public.gmane.org>
Signed-off-by: Zefan Li <lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
---
Documentation/cgroups/cpusets.txt | 6 +++---
include/linux/cpuset.h | 4 ++--
include/linux/sched.h | 13 +++++++++++--
kernel/cpuset.c | 9 +++++----
mm/slab.c | 4 ++--
5 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/cgroups/cpusets.txt b/Documentation/cgroups/cpusets.txt
index 7740038..3c94ff3 100644
--- a/Documentation/cgroups/cpusets.txt
+++ b/Documentation/cgroups/cpusets.txt
@@ -345,14 +345,14 @@ the named feature on.
The implementation is simple.
Setting the flag 'cpuset.memory_spread_page' turns on a per-process flag
-PF_SPREAD_PAGE for each task that is in that cpuset or subsequently
+PFA_SPREAD_PAGE for each task that is in that cpuset or subsequently
joins that cpuset. The page allocation calls for the page cache
-is modified to perform an inline check for this PF_SPREAD_PAGE task
+is modified to perform an inline check for this PFA_SPREAD_PAGE task
flag, and if set, a call to a new routine cpuset_mem_spread_node()
returns the node to prefer for the allocation.
Similarly, setting 'cpuset.memory_spread_slab' turns on the flag
-PF_SPREAD_SLAB, and appropriately marked slab caches will allocate
+PFA_SPREAD_SLAB, and appropriately marked slab caches will allocate
pages from the node returned by cpuset_mem_spread_node().
The cpuset_mem_spread_node() routine is also simple. It uses the
diff --git a/include/linux/cpuset.h b/include/linux/cpuset.h
index 0d4e067..2f073db 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpuset.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpuset.h
@@ -94,12 +94,12 @@ extern int cpuset_slab_spread_node(void);
static inline int cpuset_do_page_mem_spread(void)
{
- return current->flags & PF_SPREAD_PAGE;
+ return task_spread_page(current);
}
static inline int cpuset_do_slab_mem_spread(void)
{
- return current->flags & PF_SPREAD_SLAB;
+ return task_spread_slab(current);
}
extern int current_cpuset_is_being_rebound(void);
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 5630763..7b1cafe 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1903,8 +1903,6 @@ extern void thread_group_cputime_adjusted(struct task_struct *p, cputime_t *ut,
#define PF_KTHREAD 0x00200000 /* I am a kernel thread */
#define PF_RANDOMIZE 0x00400000 /* randomize virtual address space */
#define PF_SWAPWRITE 0x00800000 /* Allowed to write to swap */
-#define PF_SPREAD_PAGE 0x01000000 /* Spread page cache over cpuset */
-#define PF_SPREAD_SLAB 0x02000000 /* Spread some slab caches over cpuset */
#define PF_NO_SETAFFINITY 0x04000000 /* Userland is not allowed to meddle with cpus_allowed */
#define PF_MCE_EARLY 0x08000000 /* Early kill for mce process policy */
#define PF_MUTEX_TESTER 0x20000000 /* Thread belongs to the rt mutex tester */
@@ -1958,6 +1956,9 @@ static inline void memalloc_noio_restore(unsigned int flags)
/* Per-process atomic flags. */
#define PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS 0 /* May not gain new privileges. */
+#define PFA_SPREAD_PAGE 1 /* Spread page cache over cpuset */
+#define PFA_SPREAD_SLAB 2 /* Spread some slab caches over cpuset */
+
#define TASK_PFA_TEST(name, func) \
static inline bool task_##func(struct task_struct *p) \
@@ -1972,6 +1973,14 @@ static inline void memalloc_noio_restore(unsigned int flags)
TASK_PFA_TEST(NO_NEW_PRIVS, no_new_privs)
TASK_PFA_SET(NO_NEW_PRIVS, no_new_privs)
+TASK_PFA_TEST(SPREAD_PAGE, spread_page)
+TASK_PFA_SET(SPREAD_PAGE, spread_page)
+TASK_PFA_CLEAR(SPREAD_PAGE, spread_page)
+
+TASK_PFA_TEST(SPREAD_SLAB, spread_slab)
+TASK_PFA_SET(SPREAD_SLAB, spread_slab)
+TASK_PFA_CLEAR(SPREAD_SLAB, spread_slab)
+
/*
* task->jobctl flags
*/
diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c
index a37f4ed..1f107c7 100644
--- a/kernel/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cpuset.c
@@ -365,13 +365,14 @@ static void cpuset_update_task_spread_flag(struct cpuset *cs,
struct task_struct *tsk)
{
if (is_spread_page(cs))
- tsk->flags |= PF_SPREAD_PAGE;
+ task_set_spread_page(tsk);
else
- tsk->flags &= ~PF_SPREAD_PAGE;
+ task_clear_spread_page(tsk);
+
if (is_spread_slab(cs))
- tsk->flags |= PF_SPREAD_SLAB;
+ task_set_spread_slab(tsk);
else
- tsk->flags &= ~PF_SPREAD_SLAB;
+ task_clear_spread_slab(tsk);
}
/*
diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
index a467b30..881951e 100644
--- a/mm/slab.c
+++ b/mm/slab.c
@@ -2994,7 +2994,7 @@ out:
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
/*
- * Try allocating on another node if PF_SPREAD_SLAB is a mempolicy is set.
+ * Try allocating on another node if PFA_SPREAD_SLAB is a mempolicy is set.
*
* If we are in_interrupt, then process context, including cpusets and
* mempolicy, may not apply and should not be used for allocation policy.
@@ -3226,7 +3226,7 @@ __do_cache_alloc(struct kmem_cache *cache, gfp_t flags)
{
void *objp;
- if (current->mempolicy || unlikely(current->flags & PF_SPREAD_SLAB)) {
+ if (current->mempolicy || cpuset_do_slab_mem_spread()) {
objp = alternate_node_alloc(cache, flags);
if (objp)
goto out;
--
1.8.0.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] sched: fix confusing PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS constant
[not found] ` <54237281.5020308-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-25 1:40 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] sched: add macros to define bitops for task atomic flags Zefan Li
2014-09-25 1:41 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] cpuset: PF_SPREAD_PAGE and PF_SPREAD_SLAB should be " Zefan Li
@ 2014-09-25 2:17 ` Tejun Heo
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2014-09-25 2:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zefan Li
Cc: LKML, Cgroups, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Miao Xie, Kees Cook,
Tetsuo Handa, David Rientjes
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 09:40:17AM +0800, Zefan Li wrote:
> Commit 1d4457f99928 ("sched: move no_new_privs into new atomic flags")
> defined PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS as hexadecimal value, but it is confusing
> because it is used as bit number. Redefine it as decimal bit number.
>
> Note this changes the bit position of PFA_NOW_NEW_PRIVS from 1 to 0.
>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: Miao Xie <miaox-BthXqXjhjHXQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
> Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel-JPay3/Yim36HaxMnTkn67Xf5DAMn2ifp@public.gmane.org>
> Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
> [ lizf: slightly modified subject and changelog ]
> Signed-off-by: Zefan Li <lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Applied to cgroup/for-3.17-fixes.
Thanks.
--
tejun
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-09-25 2:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-09-25 1:40 [PATCH v4 1/3] sched: fix confusing PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS constant Zefan Li
[not found] ` <54237281.5020308-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-25 1:40 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] sched: add macros to define bitops for task atomic flags Zefan Li
2014-09-25 1:41 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] cpuset: PF_SPREAD_PAGE and PF_SPREAD_SLAB should be " Zefan Li
2014-09-25 2:17 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] sched: fix confusing PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS constant Tejun Heo
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).