From: Michal Hocko <mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Joonsoo Kim <js1304-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton
<akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>,
cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim-Hm3cg6mZ9cc@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/memcontrol: fix NULL pointer dereference when use_hierarchy is 0
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:33:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150217083327.GA32017@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1424150699-5395-1-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim-Hm3cg6mZ9cc@public.gmane.org>
On Tue 17-02-15 14:24:59, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> It can be possible to return NULL in parent_mem_cgroup()
> if use_hierarchy is 0.
This alone is not sufficient because the low limit is present only in
the unified hierarchy API and there is no use_hierarchy there. The
primary issue here is that the memcg has 0 usage so the previous
check for usage will not stop us. And that is bug IMO.
I think that the following patch would be more correct from semantic
POV:
---
From f5d74671d30e44c50b45b4464c92f536f1dbdff6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 08:02:12 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] memcg: fix low limit calculation
A memcg is considered low limited even when the current usage is equal
to the low limit. This leads to interesting side effects e.g.
groups/hierarchies with no memory accounted are considered protected and
so the reclaim will emit MEMCG_LOW event when encountering them.
Another and much bigger issue was reported by Joonsoo Kim. He has hit a
NULL ptr dereference with the legacy cgroup API which even doesn't have
low limit exposed. The limit is 0 by default but the initial check fails
for memcg with 0 consumption and parent_mem_cgroup() would return NULL
if use_hierarchy is 0 and so page_counter_read would try to dereference
NULL.
I suppose that the current implementation is just an overlook because
the documentation in Documentation/cgroups/unified-hierarchy.txt says:
"
The memory.low boundary on the other hand is a top-down allocated
reserve. A cgroup enjoys reclaim protection when it and all its
ancestors are below their low boundaries
"
Fix the usage and the low limit comparision in mem_cgroup_low accordingly.
Fixes: 241994ed8649 (mm: memcontrol: default hierarchy interface for memory)
Reported-by: Joonsoo Kim <js1304-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 0b436bc02ba4..079b5c02e245 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -5426,7 +5426,7 @@ bool mem_cgroup_low(struct mem_cgroup *root, struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
if (memcg == root_mem_cgroup)
return false;
- if (page_counter_read(&memcg->memory) > memcg->low)
+ if (page_counter_read(&memcg->memory) >= memcg->low)
return false;
while (memcg != root) {
@@ -5435,7 +5435,7 @@ bool mem_cgroup_low(struct mem_cgroup *root, struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
if (memcg == root_mem_cgroup)
break;
- if (page_counter_read(&memcg->memory) > memcg->low)
+ if (page_counter_read(&memcg->memory) >= memcg->low)
return false;
}
return true;
--
2.1.4
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-17 8:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-17 5:24 [PATCH] mm/memcontrol: fix NULL pointer dereference when use_hierarchy is 0 Joonsoo Kim
[not found] ` <1424150699-5395-1-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim-Hm3cg6mZ9cc@public.gmane.org>
2015-02-17 8:33 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
[not found] ` <20150217083327.GA32017-2MMpYkNvuYDjFM9bn6wA6Q@public.gmane.org>
2015-02-17 12:28 ` Johannes Weiner
2015-02-25 1:20 ` Joonsoo Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150217083327.GA32017@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko-alswssmvlrq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
--cc=cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim-Hm3cg6mZ9cc@public.gmane.org \
--cc=js1304-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox