From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 4/4] cgroups: implement the PIDs subsystem Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 13:47:07 -0400 Message-ID: <20150513174707.GA11388@htj.duckdns.org> References: <1429446154-10660-1-git-send-email-cyphar@cyphar.com> <1429446154-10660-5-git-send-email-cyphar@cyphar.com> <20150422162954.GF10738@htj.duckdns.org> <20150424153657.GC24029@htj.duckdns.org> <20150513172906.GY11388@htj.duckdns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=T4wQIIZpboxu8do4Mcg0Ri0gSsmNXx84u7Gbe+ATHLo=; b=A5lQJioA4i86GeXOHj70wuIVLTf/+nvu9WvYOzl4HlgictpdTYjnJ36hKY8UbWvHqv KLRTux1fVoJzUfEHczVxtnXTnJy+T3aiWZnBZreiQfwpiD7Kh05b7G6R8HcUpHooMm7t 8fwH+Bhd0hmDVsGdZABmny2ji5x1ObIeCJKJGikeppicF8GRUAZk/W7/VzEYCRLJECBF e8cdIaLWDLiU/9ygfX/xYkm7NHQMASz5ewem9pEpaklrMW3I0oYrYYb27qZQS4Zku6XV VeFSZtD7I+BXZxIG69gFUS/Em3IY3yACVHCP9VegTmfSp+QNRgChUo28ZzAxGX2PNUbN qvsQ== Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Aleksa Sarai Cc: lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, mingo-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, Peter Zijlstra , richard-/L3Ra7n9ekc@public.gmane.org, =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric?= Weisbecker , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 03:44:24AM +1000, Aleksa Sarai wrote: > I think it's because we didn't want to expose PIDS_MAX to userspace. > But we're not *really* exposing it, we're just enforcing the input > limit for "max". Ah, PIDS_MAX is fine then. Thanks. -- tejun