From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] memcg: collect kmem bypass conditions into
 __memcg_kmem_bypass()
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 12:03:13 +0300
Message-ID: <20150914090313.GC30743@esperanza>
References: <20150913201416.GC25369@htj.duckdns.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Return-path: <cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150913201416.GC25369-piEFEHQLUPpN0TnZuCh8vA@public.gmane.org>
Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
List-ID: <cgroups.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org, hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org, mhocko-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, kernel-team-b10kYP2dOMg@public.gmane.org

On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 04:14:16PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> memcg_kmem_newpage_charge() and memcg_kmem_get_cache() are testing the
> same series of conditions to decide whether to bypass kmem accounting.
> Collect the tests into __memcg_kmem_bypass().
> 
> This is pure refactoring.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>

Reviewed-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>