From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ext4: implement cgroup writeback support Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 15:03:15 -0400 Message-ID: <20150923190315.GL26647@mtj.duckdns.org> References: <1434495193-31182-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <1434495193-31182-3-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <20150722035620.GD2944@thunk.org> <1443012552.19983.209.camel@gmail.com> <20150923172535.GC25218@ret.masoncoding.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=5h+PJyv+oH7FT2fW0dBRHfsHHPv+4H55Jr5zBD+oNGM=; b=BydZ4KTqCVBfeZggg/knAIAUYP20W521FAJBXvf1m4L+JITLkz/URJVJMDrJJPSS5+ NAC8SSOG0UVKI1pot7LKQdDTFET1Rma9bloEwlsJUVEUuuyUHZPRyCA/N+7/Ei0fCqQ4 w9D4/49ntumpeYsnZZqZf5gn7PMtWkbJRrFcSqZMY68OvDsrVwl1l2poi7Hy5Oh07jXz IXaLfIJuvfz4DGAr4zMpM1AqVu74DsfdtzhptVWbUDyPYLVGwoR0+Bjd7i2x+F2Th07u HvP85uCKCWUUpa+m9jz7ckE3s4AIxkLpu5fLO3FEqq/XDW6eVd0PZ2wiqi80r0MB7TQL tM/g== Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Artem Bityutskiy Cc: linux-ext4-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org, axboe-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org, Theodore Ts'o , linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, adilger.kernel-m1MBpc4rdrD3fQ9qLvQP4Q@public.gmane.org, Chris Mason , kernel-team-b10kYP2dOMg@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org Hello, Artem. On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 08:41:25PM +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > $ sync > $ reboot > > is exactly the sequence. Can you please test with 4.3-rc2 and see whether the issue is reproducible? The multi-wb wait logic rewrite was merged during rc1 and I'm wondering whether this is a bug in the old implementation. Thanks. -- tejun