From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: PIDs Controller Limit Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 11:51:24 -0400 Message-ID: <20150928155124.GD2589@mtj.duckdns.org> References: <20150925153912.GG4449@mtj.duckdns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Vvi4H43/4+dzm4MmXFjmAsZxlhNoEQa+CG88Zs6r/KM=; b=xv3PJn6JigiJAUla+LuhMhP/33+sZ7O/Kp6yyjHIPVjzwItFjPyGOyPDesvtai+26h tKIBl2LTrFvGAdMoqKGnMp5k0D6keps/dHBxSPsup7kBUO2xwAwoweW55JnXD1nCAqpE F9Ipepr0hN0kIWt9yjPk4CNQw+A4evijDOcZmUOnUM4kApqWceM3uQqEHmBEx30GD72T Zomn09O/x2pltj5sI5dQ7+rf7xvTaesiXstYaUl4wLofEhiiQ6qh+5hE/c5Y1apaUSYJ JGx0oAHhKcTrkVmmGLP8jz/7UlyW6PJD/3/0dL2CIctlxXZ1YbQQiiRlXJF+hLYq45IW 7NFA== Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Aleksa Sarai Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org Hello, On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 09:11:02AM +1000, Aleksa Sarai wrote: > Well, it might be confusing that a limit of `0` is not different from > a limit of `1`. Especially since someone might think that a limit of > `0` means "no processes AT ALL", which is wrong. Although, I guess > they should've just RTFM'd in that case. I really don't think it matters. Thanks. -- tejun