From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCHv1 0/6] rdma controller support Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 16:08:44 -0500 Message-ID: <20160107210844.GL1898@mtj.duckdns.org> References: <20160105215623.GH5995@mtj.duckdns.org> <20160107150718.GC29797@mtj.duckdns.org> <20160107200604.GE1898@mtj.duckdns.org> <20160107203425.GG1898@mtj.duckdns.org> <20160107204921.GI1898@mtj.duckdns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=sMlrDcKfLpd8iNR5MqWYLmIreyMJhZeEsBzpABg7a0Y=; b=yxw4JfmPKIfzQ99MqOydzTKGoY586x9OJZFy0lrJgXI1tcaNw1ZrKH1MwxI5AjEmIa X+UVd4iZ7/uzRbL8pgsxhtJMwIcUQrZbpPTHoC/b1Ozu7IALcsWxO8Wm/X4xIZdYBaJe PahvdZ0dTl1uRTCwE3TtK+ypzaK4NRyFZTX9lTsgq1VQ6pBTweEOwlc34Kx7BBwywt5E ph3iUfuyR48Slwdsl2mVcN6cQ4Zwk5Bk2atuP2BPWGQIQ1psxs9DuIKeg3MlC0Hy2dAp R/UGN0rFr4VJHCjx7vYlKnk7j9pExIPLhJRie4mtf5+y9hz0KSHd5m37bLpidQp541Vv F1mw== Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Parav Pandit Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, lizefan@huawei.com, Johannes Weiner , Doug Ledford , Liran Liss , "Hefty, Sean" , Jason Gunthorpe , Haggai Eran , Jonathan Corbet , james.l.morris@oracle.com, serge@hallyn.com, Or Gerlitz , Matan Barak , raindel@mellanox.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Hello, On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 02:34:49AM +0530, Parav Pandit wrote: > That table won't be sufficient, because rdma_device is shared among > multiple rdma_cgroups each such cgroup has different individual > resource limit and usage count. This is currently rpool structure. > For res_table[] needs to be per cgroup basis. Ah, you're right. Please do whatever seems better to you. Thanks. -- tejun