Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm: migrate: do not touch page->mem_cgroup of live pages

[Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov-5HdwGun5lf+gSpxsJD1C4w@public.gmane.org>]

On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 06:19:31PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Changing a page's memcg association complicates dealing with the page,
> so we want to limit this as much as possible. Page migration e.g. does
> not have to do that. Just like page cache replacement, it can forcibly
> charge a replacement page, and then uncharge the old page when it gets
> freed. Temporarily overcharging the cgroup by a single page is not an
> issue in practice, and charging is so cheap nowadays that this is much
> preferrable to the headache of messing with live pages.
> 
> The only place that still changes the page->mem_cgroup binding of live
> pages is when pages move along with a task to another cgroup. But that
> path isolates the page from the LRU, takes the page lock, and the move
> lock (lock_page_memcg()). That means page->mem_cgroup is always stable
> in callers that have the page isolated from the LRU or locked. Lighter
> unlocked paths, like writeback accounting, can use lock_page_memcg().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>

Acked-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov-5HdwGun5lf+gSpxsJD1C4w@public.gmane.org>