From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [lxc-devel] CGroup Namespaces (v10) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:17:05 -0500 Message-ID: <20160215211705.GQ3965@htj.duckdns.org> References: <1454057651-23959-1-git-send-email-serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com> <20160212160906.GG3741@mtj.duckdns.org> <20160212232221.GA31062@mail.hallyn.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=V1Vfr5aR7j3SM3rqw8hnco6IB+1uXy+QTja2jjP2U5o=; b=BZHsVUo4R/zGAYgUxWWa5U8KDaHbRovXJghLHtp+e41lRRtl6ZxjbaLbe7iO4/exkf ZjVOOmqSY2AahdMyrsAUdls02m4z6zn9t0U184oY1zmSORxX8GAa4w4aaBQ40hlg3RBV +UqURjNi5r3++8LBIadaPZXyjIQMdU2MBgI80NnfH0Tt1iqUBoWnyi/c5CJnbRR6e+oo 3RLegs5cBmWY5K23INYWpL3G+03CcBFkq2XXlpfpG2wDvh/3vf+PdakFCaEMeOg31rEa vuzO7h4pB57jQnrj1nxWJYN9Ax7vl+9pPwZBvnX/eqsujdt3KzU2JVe46qZvnXHEfIQi uX4A== Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160212232221.GA31062-7LNsyQBKDXoIagZqoN9o3w@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" To: "Serge E. Hallyn" Cc: Alban Crequy , LXC development mailing-list , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Aditya Kali , Linux API , Linux Containers , Johannes Weiner , gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Andrew Morton On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 05:22:21PM -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 11:09:06AM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote: > > Hello, > >=20 > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 12:18:28AM +0100, Alban Crequy wrote: > > > I just noticed commit c38c4597e4bf ("netfilter: implement xt_cgro= up > > > cgroup2 path match") which, as far as I understand, introduces a = new > > > userland facing API containing the full cgroup path. Does it mean= that > > > the cgroupns patchset should include cgroup path translation in > > > xt_cgroup? > >=20 > > I don't think so. None of netfilter configuration is namespaced in > > any way. They're system-global by nature. >=20 > I assume at some point you'll want the set ported onto for-4.6 or > linux-next? My 2016-02-03/cgns set still cherrypick cleanly onto > for-4.6 at the moment, but I haven't tried linux-next, and I haven't > done build+test since 4.5-rc1 came out. I'm getting the following on top of the current for-4.6. Can you please look into it? [kernel/cgroup.c:219:13: error: =E2=80=98cgroupns_operations=E2=80=99 u= ndeclared here (not in a function) .ns.ops =3D &cgroupns_operations, ^ Thanks. --=20 tejun