From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH block/for-4.5-fixes] writeback: keep superblock pinned during cgroup writeback association switches Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 16:53:00 -0500 Message-ID: <20160228215300.GU3965@htj.duckdns.org> References: <20160217223009.GN14140@quack.suse.cz> <20160217230231.GC6479@mtj.duckdns.org> <20160218095538.GA4338@quack.suse.cz> <20160218130033.GE6479@mtj.duckdns.org> <20160219201805.GZ17997@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20160219205147.GN13177@mtj.duckdns.org> <20160219215811.GA17997@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20160219221512.GO13177@mtj.duckdns.org> <20160219222609.GC17997@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=XoKirL8XH/PJcgoStrFpVSA1S4edhneMOFZCSSZOUjQ=; b=kH2SVntE4+ATQcLlweYpJPUfAz6a1xeFYcb/xwhwo2CftrLcjmL+VQ8YRUaywYCjdi OopubI4qlFwA3L4mllWzeJwLLKErZvKNq+MIAJGwP6QnG0tvfYwvQAqil1rnrZf5iDJf 63z8ucIXIELnB5QDVXYY91f97my7p02TChR+8XoLABypFlV6RpI/nnaoissTApU0vhOT E/clxMfn6pFWlIxNIJChMWX8l6oOSyYvMo//cTnKjsqLnxlEbpVAnDsy8s87kHdpFNsR pvtl+2VB+Vz8XoWvvh8gsx3gIfY/jWJeBlLrY7kOtyn2vU33JemKrmQ0CT19fi9q7YD0 /7Dg== Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160219222609.GC17997-3bDd1+5oDREiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org> Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Al Viro Cc: Jan Kara , Tahsin Erdogan , Jens Axboe , cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Theodore Ts'o , Nauman Rafique , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Jan Kara Hello, Al. On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 10:26:09PM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > Is that code OK with e.g. running in parallel with remounting filesystem r/o? AFAICS, yeah. It doesn't care about the sb or filesystem at all. All it touches is generic inodes and their pages. Thanks. -- tejun