From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] cgroup namespaces: add a 'nsroot=' mountinfo field Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 15:12:35 -0400 Message-ID: <20160413191235.GA20142@htj.duckdns.org> References: <20160321234133.GA22463@mail.hallyn.com> <20160413175736.GC3676@htj.duckdns.org> <20160413184639.GA29483@mail.hallyn.com> <20160413185033.GH3676@htj.duckdns.org> <20160413190152.GA29753@mail.hallyn.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=ozFRTTLOkq5zqnSVSteHlHkmEKg4LuM1LXi6VPDxlrI=; b=umCjRfq6gKzyNVQDj7rTi3HN6m984m8JAWLWtE50B04PfaKRROIWi//kUwOkGgHSUx I82bn5NAvcrTIPN7YeMmcEOiBirkISVsUpI6qgS2j8mpim0pDtTeGpIWJYi+Zu+xxLxc CSLfqFHK6jNhmtxnWrZ8QPCc5meYtmfPTdkhBugJQpFhA30yIiGlFWaqpUP2azN5RGxd 0gOu0htPs4zFq91DIjmI38Wu5ncygLFdWDQdMFzdGsDMWQzbq6N13oY/oIOARjzwBEmW YfCWfNvN39hwgNu8kepXXcMpBe/S6i2xqGhU7PaMXBwwe5mvpDviChKMJ/NYc9eqZLTD 1AqQ== Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160413190152.GA29753-7LNsyQBKDXoIagZqoN9o3w@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Serge E. Hallyn" Cc: linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, adityakali-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, Linux Containers , "Eric W. Biederman" , cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, lkml Hello, On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 02:01:52PM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > I don't think so - we could be in a cgroup namespace but still have > access only to bind-mounted cgroups. So we need to compare the > superblock dentry root field to the nsroot= value. I see. No objection then. Thanks. -- tejun