From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cgroup: disable irqs while holding css_set_lock Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 18:03:15 -0400 Message-ID: <20160616220315.GH3262@mtj.duckdns.org> References: <1465325475-30593-1-git-send-email-bristot@redhat.com> <20160607193008.GA31708@htj.duckdns.org> <6f15f27f-3757-5413-4292-1386e95bc278@redhat.com> <38469b61-7cc5-5fec-4de3-0e9a616dfe95@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=wf32zfc6EkiPlu+pcAn9cs1gQL7Ez+t6c7rkQMPQ+yk=; b=ULU55dYwh/JsUktv4Oyi7amDPN6D9uaB1Lcl1UDAaZa1QkjGwo6cefgSr01oX5BcKZ ZvXf0/Eg03Yxs+1xrT1JNFFUTwQQPU3cNJDQ4TAtgt1QxiujgPR+r9axcKNIE1YUXNkh Xc4aGgHONPQeaqECypc79g6vAvuIFjoJs5HlJ4LsXfEcZkrdARTf3K1b1a15GUX6Sclw lkyX7FVAyolkBWza5hvyNjOd8YvU/PdNox/t/kYmXknLYBJF1gqwbtj4BrF7q/AcPjTO DH2GPkHD2XvaMjBRi41Ihg0ZieEGSi5FVnqBrqlfvy/5nX9/bpsD1RL5O7rdHJ5tzAh0 eoDw== Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <38469b61-7cc5-5fec-4de3-0e9a616dfe95-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Rik van Riel , "Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" , Li Zefan , Johannes Weiner , Juri Lelli , cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 06:48:56PM -0300, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote: > On 06/07/2016 05:05 PM, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote: > > On 06/07/2016 04:30 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > >> Is this something in mainline? This forces all task free path to be > >> irq-safe, which *could* be fine but it's weird to make cgroup free > >> path irq-safe for something which isn't in mainline. > > > > you mean, mainline linux kernel? if so, yes it is. I was running the > > v4.7-rc2 from Linus, as is.... no external patches applied. > > > > is there any other question/objection about this patch? Nope, I was just on vacation. Applied to cgroup/for-4.7-fixes. Thanks! -- tejun