From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roman Gushchin Subject: Re: [v4 1/4] mm, oom: refactor the TIF_MEMDIE usage Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 15:50:17 +0100 Message-ID: <20170726145017.GA24286@castle.DHCP.thefacebook.com> References: <20170726132718.14806-1-guro@fb.com> <20170726132718.14806-2-guro@fb.com> <20170726135622.GS2981@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20170726140607.GA20062@castle.DHCP.thefacebook.com> <20170726142434.GT2981@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20170726144408.GU2981@dhcp22.suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fb.com; h=date : from : to : cc : subject : message-id : references : mime-version : content-type : in-reply-to; s=facebook; bh=uiJqbM5jVrlr4ii27VuGyfqyksM4p+Z83/5Fe9JE2dc=; b=QjSZ9q1uqGUdAlSS/OBu9/WfdwfyACFt4pXiIZTC6jbyJnCquJLvfptMj0pZIQGrcSNG SIJW7GLKrnbD07V7rBoYSpUCT1cKyq1NH9D99KGoUEQqSHTpJTuv97Rf4qS+/RYSRyCJ LOKjB3TBTt4cC0AofrHm+X/3bBw/JLc67qc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fb.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-fb-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=uiJqbM5jVrlr4ii27VuGyfqyksM4p+Z83/5Fe9JE2dc=; b=LKiNBocOkq3vuGoogfMzdnsaBlcVfahtblEVs6c/ccQ0AvNkphyrc0GT0ZyIy9fN/QgUbIknD1Ual9NtF9zL3p6A8Vb5RGCP3vra1GeOzrlBh6vH/QsLlxLs96mvp1G11CjjCCrlidJbOFs6OjcTvHmR5JW/qiv9mX+wQx6Gdz0= Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170726144408.GU2981-2MMpYkNvuYDjFM9bn6wA6Q@public.gmane.org> Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Michal Hocko Cc: linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, Vladimir Davydov , Johannes Weiner , Tetsuo Handa , David Rientjes , Tejun Heo , kernel-team-b10kYP2dOMg@public.gmane.org, cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-doc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 04:44:08PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Wed 26-07-17 16:24:34, Michal Hocko wrote: > [...] > > Or if you prefer I can post it separately? > > I've just tried to rebase relevant parts on top of the current mmotm > tree and it needs some non-trivial updates. Would you mind if I post > those patches with you on CC? Sure. Again, I'm not against your approach (and I've tried to rebase your patches, and it worked well for me, although I didn't run any proper tests), I just don't want to create an unnecessary dependancy here. If your patchset will be accepted, it will be quite trivial to rebase mine and vice-versa; they are not so dependant. > I will comment on the rest of the series later. I have glanced through > it and have to digest it some more before replying. Thanks!