From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cgroup/cpuset: remove circular dependency deadlock Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 11:37:42 +0100 Message-ID: <20171115103742.xt7muaq2dfrs2cyd@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <45cdac2f-4462-e5b5-d724-8cca58e3932a@codeaurora.org> <1509347805-23491-1-git-send-email-prsood@codeaurora.org> <6f8b194f-05ec-05d4-3df6-e9eadc7f68bf@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=fPBtVvRISg48Llnu1MvKQJlujaQ+7n0VUFE1W/o/Aeg=; b=nXAAqiJMoNLulptm7UDRkSifs vFQXQgZ6TxBf61tdNjKx1NWEvaab+KQLC3rw1N4BrV3ZFrqAS9V/S8d9Jmt3pB/qR9yQCcxOc221m KaS0P18i07fjTLuRpHiwdQuqtTY3IycDB4eQDoRAhk74km85117ZKdg+l+dwzUX0oedSIpjev+Eik Dv/HC1plr+N2VUaootsGo8qVYC0ZvDoinyAymmKKRoPwmYhmO2g00+FkI5iCG5JjqAjkT/5KQWE5l 1pOVo8QvwX/8AmF11g4xPSoslU0u2YDJgUEAmfkbBrfg3jBtcYmibPfK7GCHBUtnhE6SsTSOLk2Nm Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6f8b194f-05ec-05d4-3df6-e9eadc7f68bf-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Prateek Sood Cc: longman-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, mingo-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, boqun.feng-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org, cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, sramana-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 03:56:26PM +0530, Prateek Sood wrote: > Any improvement/suggestion for this patch? I would have done 2 patches, the first one solving the locking issue, the second removing the then redundant async rebuild stuff. Other than that this looks OK I suppose, but I was expecting this to go through the cgroup tree, TJ?