From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: cgroups(7): documenting cgroups v2 delegation Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 14:14:18 -0800 Message-ID: <20180110221418.GF3460072@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> References: <1ce0a885-94fb-7480-7180-7b873c95b1bb@gmail.com> <20180108141450.GP3668920@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> <6c9fdaee-739f-164d-d04e-fb3a7319db90@gmail.com> <20180109210722.GS3668920@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> <672cd179-31be-e03a-f9ff-ce59b76e23e2@gmail.com> <20180110142640.GB3668920@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> <655118da-6d58-8f02-7367-77c10a3c16ea@gmail.com> <20180110193907.GC3460072@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=qbDxU+eZBpl+YQBLMaKjTTnhMpeqsP1WLDmXHgGSwnY=; b=TQTrcA/6S4qq+Pkp+99hi5c39yuMmQ1n15qkGl2v3HJ/a3MkzYs0O8Ky7zLqKBIHhI iiCm0QEMCbrv0g1O+GAKBzWInklJB5pilUVCT9KM8hDxgEwIZdntkMER26NgTWoiSaQ0 N0VnMwROHGSrqMLSqRByRWCgLEqH8lbdcC6c5QvBvgql2a23ktPaD1cvN+ff6AUEYkte EsXlc/2CS0/pSEmiyYR7uKtcJuW5Hcsr/PYT1dD/OzaR4L9BkIt6Mnyyra8Qzpmt4wFq /v9m9QoUCQbfTgWu/KM7BO0j36eENItn8hwyFBhABq40PZ++Vnzw0bV7LFEfcFQJF2IY YpqA== Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-man-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" , linux-man , lkml , cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Roman Gushchin Hello, Michael. On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:01:11PM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > >>>> Can you please confirm that it's only necessary to delegate this file > >>>> if we are delegating a threaded subtree? > >>> > >>> Replied on the other thread. The file isn't delegatable as far as I > >>> can tell. > >> > >> So, following on from the discussion in the other thread, my > >> question above still stands. > > > > Oh, I frankly haven't thought about delegating a threaded subtree. > > I'm still confused. cgroup-v2.txt documents the possibility. You > wrote that text. We just had a conversation in another thread about the > fact that cgroup.threads is delegatable. You must have thought at > least a little about this? Oh, I'm probably mixing up two things. 1. When delegating, cgroup.threads should be delegated. Doing that selectively doesn't achieve anything meaningful. 2. I haven't thought much about delegating a sub-protion of a threaded subtree. Everything works the same way. I just can't think of a use case. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html