From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michal Hocko Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] mm/memcontrol.c: Reduce reclaim retries in mem_cgroup_resize_limit() Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 16:31:32 +0100 Message-ID: <20180119153132.GF6584@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20171220102429.31601-1-aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> <20180119132544.19569-1-aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> <20180119132544.19569-2-aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> <20180119133510.GD6584@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20180119151118.GE6584@dhcp22.suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Shakeel Butt Cc: Andrey Ryabinin , Andrew Morton , Cgroups , LKML , Linux MM , Johannes Weiner , Vladimir Davydov On Fri 19-01-18 07:24:08, Shakeel Butt wrote: [...] > Thanks for the explanation. Another query, we do not call > drain_all_stock() in mem_cgroup_resize_limit() but memory_max_write() > does call drain_all_stock(). Was this intentional or missed > accidentally? I think it is just an omission. I would have to look closer but I am just leaving now and will be back on Tuesday. This is unrelated so I would rather discuss it in a separate email thread. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs