From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Juri Lelli Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 4/6] cpuset: Make generate_sched_domains() recognize isolated_cpus Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 12:28:37 +0200 Message-ID: <20180524102837.GA3948@localhost.localdomain> References: <1526590545-3350-1-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com> <1526590545-3350-5-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1526590545-3350-5-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Waiman Long Cc: Tejun Heo , Li Zefan , Johannes Weiner , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com, pjt@google.com, luto@amacapital.net, Mike Galbraith , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Roman Gushchin On 17/05/18 16:55, Waiman Long wrote: [...] > @@ -849,7 +860,12 @@ static void rebuild_sched_domains_locked(void) > * passing doms with offlined cpu to partition_sched_domains(). > * Anyways, hotplug work item will rebuild sched domains. > */ > - if (!cpumask_equal(top_cpuset.effective_cpus, cpu_active_mask)) > + if (!top_cpuset.isolation_count && > + !cpumask_equal(top_cpuset.effective_cpus, cpu_active_mask)) > + goto out; > + > + if (top_cpuset.isolation_count && > + !cpumask_subset(top_cpuset.effective_cpus, cpu_active_mask)) > goto out; Do we cover the case in which hotplug removed one of the isolated cpus from cpu_active_mask?