From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/7] cpuset: Add new v2 cpuset.sched.domain_root flag Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 11:49:43 +0200 Message-ID: <20180531094943.GG12180@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1527601294-3444-1-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com> <1527601294-3444-3-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=YPwuIStifaMAixrdlInWE8+yShLKNE+jvdZoydpcXf8=; b=P5dkN8xMIoYtv0LtfaI7tr+6n C58w1+5p+UByAfY0aTkMuOjUMDhdqeQ1JP2k9/0aoaBTTOx6+rSYVGzjm9FPPE+KZucUSePbLUNrD wSVrOLdXwQG6z7+iCRrZZzU88GlFLxu642Quoax5W5lgzH6L0gJB6UBjdwStfTcqudAta6OYKVDMr 38hSxYsEdndUDC+uyzI++KXFYD9Tzsc/X4WWIUhcYT2CkHqClxQlSIrRcNwEev/YpdDrwbEFv0OXb s1cDaWCKN+CyuYnHFqu85qvlWW1tvq1Cd+9Uzmjh0cjKX1x8BcYKWaJkESTbFxcMrVQ3AxNxd48sB Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1527601294-3444-3-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Waiman Long Cc: Tejun Heo , Li Zefan , Johannes Weiner , Ingo Molnar , cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com, pjt@google.com, luto@amacapital.net, Mike Galbraith , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Roman Gushchin , Juri Lelli , Patrick Bellasi On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 09:41:29AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > + cpuset.sched.domain_root > + A read-write single value file which exists on non-root > + cpuset-enabled cgroups. It is a binary value flag that accepts > + either "0" (off) or "1" (on). This flag is set by the parent > + and is not delegatable. What does "is not delegatable" mean? I think you used to say "is owned by the parent", which is took to mean file ownership is that of the parent directory (..) and not of the current (,), which is slightly odd but works. So if you chown a cgroup to a user, that user will not be able to change the file of it's 'root' (will actually be the root in case of container), but it _can_ change this file for any sub-cgroups it creates, right? So in that respect the feature is delegatable, a container can create sub-partitions. It just cannot change it's 'root' partition, which is consistent with a real root. The only inconsistently left is then that the real root does not have the file at all, vs a container root having it, but not accessible.