From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, luca.abeni@santannapisa.it,
claudio@evidence.eu.com, tommaso.cucinotta@santannapisa.it,
bristot@redhat.com, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org,
lizefan@huawei.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] sched/topology: Adding function partition_sched_domains_locked()
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 15:47:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180614134731.GD12032@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180614093536.612712f6@gandalf.local.home>
On 14/06/18 09:35, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 14:17:08 +0200
> Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> wrote:
[...]
> > +/*
> > + * Call with hotplug lock held
> > + */
> > +void partition_sched_domains(int ndoms_new, cpumask_var_t doms_new[],
> > + struct sched_domain_attr *dattr_new)
> > +{
> > + lockdep_assert_cpus_held();
>
> Is the above assert really necessary? The assert will happen in
> partition_sched_domains_locked() anyway.
Indeed, it seems of little use.
Thanks,
- Juri
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-14 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-13 12:17 [PATCH v4 0/5] sched/deadline: fix cpusets bandwidth accounting Juri Lelli
2018-06-13 12:17 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] sched/topology: Add check to backup comment about hotplug lock Juri Lelli
2018-06-14 13:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-06-14 13:42 ` Juri Lelli
2018-06-14 13:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-06-14 13:50 ` Juri Lelli
2018-06-14 13:58 ` Quentin Perret
2018-06-14 14:11 ` Juri Lelli
2018-06-14 14:18 ` Quentin Perret
2018-06-14 14:30 ` Juri Lelli
2018-06-15 8:39 ` Quentin Perret
2018-06-13 12:17 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] sched/topology: Adding function partition_sched_domains_locked() Juri Lelli
2018-06-14 13:35 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-06-14 13:47 ` Juri Lelli [this message]
2018-06-13 12:17 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] sched/core: Streamlining calls to task_rq_unlock() Juri Lelli
2018-06-14 13:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-06-13 12:17 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] sched/core: Prevent race condition between cpuset and __sched_setscheduler() Juri Lelli
2018-06-14 13:45 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-06-14 13:51 ` Juri Lelli
2018-06-14 20:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-06-15 7:01 ` Juri Lelli
2018-06-15 13:07 ` Juri Lelli
2018-06-13 12:17 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] cpuset: Rebuild root domain deadline accounting information Juri Lelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180614134731.GD12032@localhost.localdomain \
--to=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=claudio@evidence.eu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=luca.abeni@santannapisa.it \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tommaso.cucinotta@santannapisa.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).