From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roman Gushchin Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 0/7] cgroup-aware OOM killer Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 15:09:21 -0700 Message-ID: <20180716220918.GA3898@castle.DHCP.thefacebook.com> References: <20171130152824.1591-1-guro@fb.com> <20180605114729.GB19202@dhcp22.suse.cz> <0a86d2a7-b78e-7e69-f628-aa2c75d91ff0@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> <0d018c7e-a3de-a23a-3996-bed8b28b1e4a@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fb.com; h=date : from : to : cc : subject : message-id : references : mime-version : content-type : in-reply-to; s=facebook; bh=UtwC/tk2CmIwywKkFSnhK9NMVhM9ctrpgWHZMq2l6Bs=; b=fc60SGi8JfcvTZz/PCi9DYxHZ09jQl3VKqeJkMI4DtRNT9ckTIMjctMkl3zGa6RCEt4N B2MVgpYBFEuxKAKWa/egfrcm4DcJ7Y1c/GLoMHEQJZDKKBeXpGZcZ6qBooTBYEc6VVTa 2x7jm+7ML3R5csZ3SU/n4BTZEhThnm0svYo= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fb.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-fb-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=UtwC/tk2CmIwywKkFSnhK9NMVhM9ctrpgWHZMq2l6Bs=; b=PxdrHb43VYXefhy+O0TUtGA3uy/vXF8QIOKWTGMszfVm1woCKoO1kBvtZrN5YCFN9zRV/R7OUwuIT/IqMfHymw8vk2S3Ja61m2FDh/rf8HePZvXsTe/gJb18E3YhDQvJUZA/dG4wQgpUMsxVFJ1aHQjl390Fa2VuEQjKySd1zpc= Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0d018c7e-a3de-a23a-3996-bed8b28b1e4a@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Tetsuo Handa Cc: Andrew Morton , David Rientjes , Michal Hocko , linux-mm@vger.kernel.org, Vladimir Davydov , Johannes Weiner , Tejun Heo , kernel-team@fb.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 06:13:47AM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > No response from Roman and David... > > Andrew, will you once drop Roman's cgroup-aware OOM killer and David's patches? > Roman's series has a bug which I mentioned and which can be avoided by my patch. > David's patch is using MMF_UNSTABLE incorrectly such that it might start selecting > next OOM victim without trying to reclaim any memory. > > Since they are not responding to my mail, I suggest once dropping from linux-next. I was in cc, and didn't thought that you're expecting something from me. I don't get, why it's necessary to drop the cgroup oom killer to merge your fix? I'm happy to help with rebasing and everything else. Thanks, Roman