From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] psi: pressure stall information for CPU, memory, and IO v4 Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 13:04:07 +0200 Message-ID: <20180907110407.GQ24106@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20180828172258.3185-1-hannes@cmpxchg.org> <20180905214303.GA30178@cmpxchg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Zj9m3bL7/GgZO6pd5S6/GDfgJpek/j4NHkhjpGW5ueg=; b=yzZHaAUklP+KBx3mEVEfW/ZMY vXFpwnbTFa85MRnCiD5xEt7/JkNQRFdeVjiDTEbgwoYWKG+4KyLCo4K2uM3rL+0tcAkeNRDioOpe8 C5QbbmQ/iF7OyOrgqdjEKvM2ayJZKh7rX49/A1CS7//fQRCcsTP3hdmZsC86biJlwipQlWGp4hPGa 5z+iT6cMkXuvfP7TaWJHOFK25JDinH83ZOWYgj7JqIJZdYtpYMTfdJmJjy4MXP09G626dIC7khjoR dNxQiBI8tCDiEqi0+BUbBj1KELBV78HL2v5Kh9O4ngzC/PCs2ZkWhOMxwSMiDvInRoWNcmqc1o4In Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180905214303.GA30178@cmpxchg.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Johannes Weiner Cc: Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Tejun Heo , Suren Baghdasaryan , Daniel Drake , Vinayak Menon , Christopher Lameter , Peter Enderborg , Shakeel Butt , Mike Galbraith , linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 05:43:03PM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote: > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 01:22:49PM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote: > > This version 4 of the PSI series incorporates feedback from Peter and > > fixes two races in the lockless aggregator that Suren found in his > > testing and which caused the sample calculation to sometimes underflow > > and record bogusly large samples; details at the bottom of this email. > > Peter, do the changes from v3 look sane to you? > > If there aren't any further objections, I was hoping we could get this > lined up for 4.20. I suppose it looks ok, there's a few small nits, but nothing big. I still hate psi_ttwu_dequeue(), but I don't really know what to about that. So yeah, grudingly acked. Did you want me to pick this up through the scheduler tree since most of this lives there?