From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guroan@gmail.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Kernel Team <Kernel-team@fb.com>,
"cgroups@vger.kernel.org" <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 4/7] cgroup: cgroup v2 freezer
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 17:44:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190221164403.GB26064@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190220221423.GA17163@castle.DHCP.thefacebook.com>
On 02/20, Roman Gushchin wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 03:42:02PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > On 02/19, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> > >
> > > @@ -2363,7 +2419,8 @@ bool get_signal(struct ksignal *ksig)
> > > * we should notify the parent, prepare_signal(SIGCONT) encodes
> > > * the CLD_ si_code into SIGNAL_CLD_MASK bits.
> > > */
> > > - if (unlikely(signal->flags & SIGNAL_CLD_MASK)) {
> > > + if (unlikely(signal->flags & SIGNAL_CLD_MASK) &
> > > + !(current->jobctl & JOBCTL_TRAP_FREEZE)) {
> >
> > Hmm, why?
>
> If a process is going from the stopped to the frozen state, it looks like
> it's better to delay parent's notification up to the moment when it will
> actually run.
Perhaps I missed something but I do not understand why it is really better,
at least why it deserves this (small but still) complication...
OK, if nothing else, suppose that SIGCONT races with cgroup_do_freeze(true).
With or without this change CLD_CONTINUED can be reported or not depending
on /dev/random, do we really care?
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-21 16:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-19 22:02 [PATCH v8 0/7] freezer for cgroup v2 Roman Gushchin
2019-02-19 22:02 ` [PATCH v8 1/7] cgroup: rename freezer.c into legacy_freezer.c Roman Gushchin
2019-02-19 22:02 ` [PATCH v8 2/7] cgroup: implement __cgroup_task_count() helper Roman Gushchin
2019-02-19 22:02 ` [PATCH v8 3/7] cgroup: protect cgroup->nr_(dying_)descendants by css_set_lock Roman Gushchin
2019-02-19 22:02 ` [PATCH v8 4/7] cgroup: cgroup v2 freezer Roman Gushchin
2019-02-20 14:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-02-20 22:14 ` Roman Gushchin
2019-02-21 16:44 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2019-02-19 22:02 ` [PATCH v8 5/7] kselftests: cgroup: don't fail on cg_kill_all() error in cg_destroy() Roman Gushchin
2019-02-19 22:02 ` [PATCH v8 6/7] kselftests: cgroup: add freezer controller self-tests Roman Gushchin
2019-02-19 22:02 ` [PATCH v8 7/7] cgroup: document cgroup v2 freezer interface Roman Gushchin
2019-02-20 14:37 ` [PATCH v8 0/7] freezer for cgroup v2 Oleg Nesterov
2019-02-20 22:00 ` Roman Gushchin
2019-02-21 16:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-02-21 17:34 ` Tejun Heo
2019-02-22 16:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-02-22 18:17 ` Tejun Heo
2019-02-25 15:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-03-05 17:27 ` Tejun Heo
2019-02-21 22:43 ` Roman Gushchin
2019-02-22 17:04 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190221164403.GB26064@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=Kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=guroan@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).