From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Juri Lelli Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 6/8] cgroup/cpuset: Change cpuset_rwsem and hotplug lock order Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 16:04:09 +0200 Message-ID: <20190712140409.GB13885@localhost.localdomain> References: <20190628080618.522-1-juri.lelli@redhat.com> <20190628080618.522-7-juri.lelli@redhat.com> <20190628130308.GU3419@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20190701065233.GA26005@localhost.localdomain> <20190701082731.GP3402@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20190701145107.GY657710@devbig004.ftw2.facebook.com> <20190704084924.GC9099@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190704084924.GC9099@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Tejun Heo Cc: Peter Zijlstra , mingo@redhat.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, luca.abeni@santannapisa.it, claudio@evidence.eu.com, tommaso.cucinotta@santannapisa.it, bristot@redhat.com, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org, lizefan@huawei.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, Prateek Sood On 04/07/19 10:49, Juri Lelli wrote: > Hi, > > On 01/07/19 07:51, Tejun Heo wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 10:27:31AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > IIRC TJ figured it wasn't strictly required to fix the lock invertion at > > > that time and they sorted it differently. If I (re)read the thread > > > correctly the other day, he didn't have fundamental objections against > > > it, but wanted the simpler fix. > > > > Yeah I've got no objections to the change itself, it just wasn't > > needed at the time. We've had multiple issues there tho, so please > > keep an eye open after the changes get merged. > > Should I take this as an indication that you had a look at the set and > (apart from Peter's comments) you are OK with them? > > If that's the case I will send a v9 out soon. Otherwise I'd kindly ask > you to please have a look. Gentle ping. Thanks, Juri