From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roman Gushchin Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 6/9] kselftests: cgroup: add freezer controller self-tests Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 00:49:09 +0000 Message-ID: <20190717004904.GA32357@castle.dhcp.thefacebook.com> References: <20190405174708.1010-1-guro@fb.com> <20190405174708.1010-7-guro@fb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fb.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=facebook; bh=2ku0EgpNaitFugfFNzpgMALweDBXYpV13ha37sxxzNA=; b=QbEAEUBUPn6VLAN/vtr8FYloi3NRkRU78Lid6weyNKNF6L82MGcl+6UiYtwu/HtfzBR0 EolJ1gPXAo3+Nvzc1PYi4BpeXYkxkWF7nyumlcrCV+32S6pFZKuOlaR6HTrUeIL3zbf9 jcN/aHGVue8l3K+rGa8291gDfwSyul+ph9w= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fb.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-fb-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=2ku0EgpNaitFugfFNzpgMALweDBXYpV13ha37sxxzNA=; b=JlAW30qUeCKMtzBUftDIY+1IqJLiUTJTnRHfxw27GvjfOrYfylUKjU/tV3sajtOlbzuaAcC496xUmjcS6kDVwowioP0VmO8ya1ZvWZPld6wy0rFrEzSmvkgJHuqsk9ro4tlc7ZAZtlgv1EikMp2fhJFGjcwiAJpENYxYC2hNnqg= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Content-ID: <6615751279655F448AC550872ECF4FCD@namprd15.prod.outlook.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Naresh Kamboju Cc: Roman Gushchin , Tejun Heo , Oleg Nesterov , Kernel Team , "cgroups@vger.kernel.org" , open list , Shuah Khan , "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" , "lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org" On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 08:18:39PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > Hi Roman, >=20 > Just want to share information here on what we notice on running this tes= t case, Hi Naresh! Thank you for the report! The interaction between ptrace and freezer is complicated (as ptrace in general),so there are known cases when spurious cgroup transitions (frozen <-> non frozen <-> frozen ) can happen. Does it create any difficulties? If so, I'll send a diff to ignore the result of this test for now. Thank you! >=20 > On Fri, 5 Apr 2019 at 23:17, Roman Gushchin wrote: > > > > This patch implements 9 tests for the freezer controller for > > cgroup v2: > ... > > 6) ptrace test: the test checks that it's possible to attach to > > a process in a frozen cgroup, get some information and detach, and > > the cgroup will remain frozen. >=20 > selftests cgroup test_freezer failed because of the sys entry path not fo= und. Can you, please, elaborate on this? > Cgroup /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/cg_test_ptrace isn't frozen > /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/cg_test_ptrace: isn't_frozen # > # not ok 6 test_cgfreezer_ptrace >=20 > This test case fails intermittently. Thank you!