From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Juri Lelli Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/8] sched/core: Streamlining calls to task_rq_unlock() Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 16:58:18 +0200 Message-ID: <20190723145818.GI25636@localhost.localdomain> References: <20190719140000.31694-1-juri.lelli@redhat.com> <20190719140000.31694-3-juri.lelli@redhat.com> <50f00347-ffb3-285c-5a7d-3a9c5f813950@arm.com> <20190722083214.GF25636@localhost.localdomain> <20190723103131.GB3402@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20190723131100.GE696309@devbig004.ftw2.facebook.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190723131100.GE696309@devbig004.ftw2.facebook.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Tejun Heo Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Dietmar Eggemann , mingo@redhat.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, luca.abeni@santannapisa.it, claudio@evidence.eu.com, tommaso.cucinotta@santannapisa.it, bristot@redhat.com, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org, lizefan@huawei.com, longman@redhat.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org On 23/07/19 06:11, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 12:31:31PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 10:32:14AM +0200, Juri Lelli wrote: > > > > > Thanks for reporting. The set is based on cgroup/for-next (as of last > > > week), though. I can of course rebase on tip/sched/core or mainline if > > > needed. > > > > TJ; I would like to take these patches through the scheduler tree if you > > don't mind. Afaict there's no real conflict vs cgroup/for-next (I > > applied the patches and then did a pull of cgroup/for-next which > > finished without complaints). > > Yeah, for sure, please go ahead. > > Thanks. Thanks!