From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Madhuparna Bhowmik Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup.c: Use built-in RCU list checking Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 21:37:52 +0530 Message-ID: <20200129160752.GA15913@madhuparna-HP-Notebook> References: <20200118031051.28776-1-madhuparnabhowmik10@gmail.com> <20200129142255.GE11384@blackbody.suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=8JqRhiDOHvgPoZeVnB2/bI1P2RUwGdHALzeY09zc6AU=; b=ub6sLpwwTWJc0DJT5UDWjzIwiugnQZno6L7yV/YzPZ8PqzySLQXrh33ibMBqECPhJD i9qOjKCFkLgTXci2siKMJV8UPCXQp64Lyq1A1WUISGnU8/VjWj/5CSaxVIoRiykTHk1p JPKxjK2SB0vZgMmpC4PEnEqnqzkH1P0ggO2vuTFS+ycnVNAXDMjdpH2IcFE9er0hsq2n 1f/zNiMjsiyUqIDoHgijiNx8MFfRWO6nS6mwZ7mfh/xk0B22tJ4KUfJ8+19iGNKxOV68 NFdruNQIX4Qj4BMlPk4Rwuf/xEYyeCne9qEkSUEnt8UGY1tYI1t/6sQAeJKSE8jU0w4Y j04w== Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200129142255.GE11384@blackbody.suse.cz> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: Michal =?iso-8859-1?Q?Koutn=FD?= Cc: madhuparnabhowmik10@gmail.com, tj@kernel.org, lizefan@huawei.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, joel@joelfernandes.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org, frextrite@gmail.com On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 03:22:55PM +0100, Michal Koutn=FD wrote: > Hello. >=20 > On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 08:40:51AM +0530, madhuparnabhowmik10@gmail.com w= rote: > > From: Madhuparna Bhowmik > >=20 > > list_for_each_entry_rcu has built-in RCU and lock checking. > > Pass cond argument to list_for_each_entry_rcu() to silence > > false lockdep warning when CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_LIST is enabled > > by default. > I assume if you've seen the RCU warning, you haven't seen the warning > from cgroup_assert_mutex_or_rcu_locked() above.=20 > No, I haven't seen any warning from cgroup_assert_mutex_or_rcu_locked(), I am just doing the conversions to prevent any false lockdep warnings because of CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_LIST in the future. > The patch makes sense to me from the consistency POV. >=20 Thank you, Madhuparna > Acked-by: Michal Koutn=FD >=20 > Michal