From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 1/9] hugetlb_cgroup: Add hugetlb_cgroup reservation counter Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 13:06:48 -0800 Message-ID: <20200219130648.83e6810848774c6fd649c445@linux-foundation.org> References: <20200211213128.73302-1-almasrymina@google.com> <20200211151906.637d1703e4756066583b89da@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1582146409; bh=We7qiHyZF1+0bxnalw+B0B6unBvDDpo3FZ3UilP54wo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ukHYLZC7569bA3jMgJUE4Me0eScdonEH4QsdinQzJLb/YmaJEH255Pbk2YXN3mr++ 8Wg+cUdQTDSNrybE0lLFSy2X/bFPK8Dj5fyqLpxDt9xuTdPnYxpJKwIX5E0LNZZBZp gfmu61lnSEqsTfX2wTnJ6qyaDxsrEdO8My8VKDao= In-Reply-To: Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Mina Almasry Cc: Mike Kravetz , shuah , David Rientjes , Shakeel Butt , Greg Thelen , open list , linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, linux-kselftest-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org On Wed, 19 Feb 2020 11:05:41 -0800 Mina Almasry wrote: > On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 3:19 PM Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > On Tue, 11 Feb 2020 13:31:20 -0800 Mina Almasry wrote: > > > > > These counters will track hugetlb reservations rather than hugetlb > > > memory faulted in. This patch only adds the counter, following patches > > > add the charging and uncharging of the counter. > > > > We're still pretty thin on review here, but as it's v12 and Mike > > appears to be signed up to look at this work, I'll add them to -next to > > help move things forward. > > > > Hi Andrew, > > Since the patches were merged into -next there have been build fixes > and test fixes and some review comments. Would you like me to submit > *new* patches to address these, or would you like me to squash the > fixes into my existing patch series and submit another iteration of > the patch series? What you did worked OK ;) Please check the end result next time I release a kernel.