From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [regression] cpuset: offlined CPUs removed from affinity masks Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 10:52:02 -0500 Message-ID: <20200219155202.GE698990@mtj.thefacebook.com> References: <1251528473.590671.1579196495905.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <1317969050.4131.1581955387909.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <20200219151922.GB698990@mtj.thefacebook.com> <1589496945.670.1582126985824.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <20200219154740.GD698990@mtj.thefacebook.com> <59426509.702.1582127435733.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=fFVDMYCiG2Jj7QSlhcVZE7ZVXQws5yCHBTafyc8gAf0=; b=Qkf7uJ1c4rV5Qm1v9FuRvQTyPOE0LdHlD1+++LZmhiqhFLAYLJCJQYulwn5mGbVQSQ b93pgugYT/+zQWagehceyEAvjfr1/EXp/YZpqn3v0IJ1ru89mZ3VSjJS6GRX/FI9LJCe XB0ajQwGjX/snUDFYuq61rJEPhUPxutyuiw8s3DOs6i/EgCsMkd4HnJsxkztYM9Me6sx 9o5BLcIFLyBJNWmV3BNFtO7yrg1L1MEmQ31pETajfSjjFWOV9MPZ54G3lgfVDbpSuNWK DqTsVYB/R3ez5ZLWy+GAX7MGLOc4sP/o+7xmXydKDgRpRW3B24yugdxMlZlSWMa/UEEc BdOQ== Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <59426509.702.1582127435733.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Mathieu Desnoyers Cc: Li Zefan , cgroups , linux-kernel , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Valentin Schneider On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 10:50:35AM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > I can look into figuring out the commit introducing this issue, which I > suspect will be close to the introduction of CONFIG_CPUSET into the > kernel (which was ages ago). I'll check and let you know. Oh, yeah, I'm pretty sure it goes way back. I don't think tracking that down would be necessary. I was just wondering whether it was a recent change because you said it was a regression. -- tejun