From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, memcg: unify reclaim retry limits with page allocator Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 16:42:43 -0700 Message-ID: <20200520164243.56133fa135f65cc708e70ec0@linux-foundation.org> References: <20200520163142.GA808793@chrisdown.name> <20200520164037.e3598bc902e39415f4c263e7@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1590018164; bh=l2mS/FNkusn6YLF9oQ03x6lf0x9xSKXhbjmtXuuKOEU=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=qJ+3eof3hck1Gh1nBa2/+j6vwmtmoQW2xYQ0eTC853DIb8H/4+cHCLfaXLzznyRd6 ZFvs8b1FX05UdabsiW4zNAhkt+Oi8JMbHMFNUnude+cklLBNZvcgSEyR+fU9qXbBDa 2AkRUBPbAjt3JLK7Wd6YJ3db43kp8TzLxIItbyQo= In-Reply-To: <20200520164037.e3598bc902e39415f4c263e7@linux-foundation.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Chris Down , Johannes Weiner , Michal Hocko , linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com On Wed, 20 May 2020 16:40:37 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote: > > -/* The number of times we should retry reclaim failures before giving up. */ > > hm, what tree is this against? Ah, my habit of working in reverse time order sometimes does this ;) I suggest that "mm, memcg: reclaim more aggressively before high allocator throttling" and this patch become a two-patch series?