From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Qian Cai Subject: Re: [Resend PATCH 1/6] mm/memcg: warning on !memcg after readahead page charged Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 10:01:43 -0400 Message-ID: <20200821140134.GA8147@lca.pw> References: <1597144232-11370-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> <20200820145850.GA4622@lca.pw> <20200821080127.GD32537@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20200821123934.GA4314@lca.pw> <20200821134842.GF32537@dhcp22.suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lca.pw; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=cA1F72P9Gm2cautm1YaokGwNbN8rzVJerys9S7kz+dY=; b=nkPVH+Ovq+PbJXglpdeME9hid7vf1PM4g5XbkjiJo5EratmsU7t9cUuws/8svKmlrP EeJLdQjFqqNF2PsTU39YI7W6UsK8DFi1Nsy2Fsed4IO48Km3gUAjJBL70SSYLIFiXjHT apFxLWdt25F9C+P6lXRwJOvayqJmLTXwaQtRh7tn1NVJ1G7xJKl4g02yk1IOhlgJXpgE uhu72bWnmxOnt+jHNENMYLGGBUgmEqijytDjIXanSn7EPu572k+I6lEd46ZQ5uvzCaUz QOGQUAuwpZeIzffQ1NmA823BQb4J5ZlOOb2aQbwOMLeV5GUlsqBpF4j6iEl1YEtNCXX0 Dl+A== Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200821134842.GF32537-2MMpYkNvuYDjFM9bn6wA6Q@public.gmane.org> Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Michal Hocko Cc: Alex Shi , akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org, Johannes Weiner , Vladimir Davydov , cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, nao.horiguchi-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, osalvador-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org, mike.kravetz-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 03:48:42PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Fri 21-08-20 08:39:37, Qian Cai wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 10:01:27AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > On Thu 20-08-20 10:58:51, Qian Cai wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 07:10:27PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote: > > > > > Since readahead page is charged on memcg too, in theory we don't have to > > > > > check this exception now. Before safely remove them all, add a warning > > > > > for the unexpected !memcg. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Alex Shi > > > > > Acked-by: Michal Hocko > > > > > > > > This will trigger, > > > > > > Thanks for the report! > > > > > > > [ 1863.916499] LTP: starting move_pages12 > > > > [ 1863.946520] page:000000008ccc1062 refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x1fd3c0 > > > > [ 1863.946553] head:000000008ccc1062 order:5 compound_mapcount:0 compound_pincount:0 > > > > > > Hmm, this is really unexpected. How did we get order-5 page here? Is > > > this some special mappaing that sys_move_pages should just ignore? > > > > Well, I thought everybody should be able to figure out where to find the LTP > > tests source code at this stage to see what it does. Anyway, the test simply > > migrate hugepages while soft offlining, so order 5 is expected as that is 2M > > hugepage on powerpc (also reproduced on x86 below). It might be easier to > > reproduce using our linux-mm random bug collection on NUMA systems. > > OK, I must have missed that this was on ppc. The order makes more sense > now. I will have a look at this next week. Sorry about not mentioning powerpc in the first place. I don't know since when powerpc will no longer print out hardware information like x86 does in those warning reports. I'll dig.