From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jacob Pan Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 15/18] cgroup: Introduce ioasids controller Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 16:02:05 -0800 Message-ID: <20210303160205.151d114e@jacob-builder> References: <1614463286-97618-1-git-send-email-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> <1614463286-97618-16-git-send-email-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> <20210303131726.7a8cb169@jacob-builder> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20210303131726.7a8cb169@jacob-builder> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Sender: "iommu" To: Tejun Heo Cc: "Tian, Kevin" , Alex Williamson , Raj Ashok , Jonathan Corbet , Jean-Philippe Brucker , LKML , Dave Jiang , iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, Jason Gunthorpe , Johannes Weiner , cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Wu Hao , David Woodhouse Hi Jacob, On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 13:17:26 -0800, Jacob Pan wrote: > Hi Tejun, > > On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 10:44:28 -0500, Tejun Heo wrote: > > > On Sat, Feb 27, 2021 at 02:01:23PM -0800, Jacob Pan wrote: > > > IOASIDs are used to associate DMA requests with virtual address > > > spaces. They are a system-wide limited resource made available to the > > > userspace applications. Let it be VMs or user-space device drivers. > > > > > > This RFC patch introduces a cgroup controller to address the following > > > problems: > > > 1. Some user applications exhaust all the available IOASIDs thus > > > depriving others of the same host. > > > 2. System admins need to provision VMs based on their needs for > > > IOASIDs, e.g. the number of VMs with assigned devices that perform > > > DMA requests with PASID. > > > > Please take a look at the proposed misc controller: > > > > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210302081705.1990283-2-vipinsh-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org > > > > Would that fit your bill? > The interface definitely can be reused. But IOASID has a different > behavior in terms of migration and ownership checking. I guess SEV key > IDs are not tied to a process whereas IOASIDs are. Perhaps this can be > solved by adding > + .can_attach = ioasids_can_attach, > + .cancel_attach = ioasids_cancel_attach, > Let me give it a try and come back. > While I am trying to fit the IOASIDs cgroup in to the misc cgroup proposal. I'd like to have a direction check on whether this idea of using cgroup for IOASID/PASID resource management is viable. Alex/Jason/Jean and everyone, your feedback is much appreciated. > Thanks for the pointer. > > Jacob > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > Thanks, > > Jacob Thanks, Jacob