public inbox for cgroups@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: rcu <rcu@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Radoslaw Burny <rburny@google.com>,
	Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 00/12] locking: Separate lock tracepoints from lockdep/lock_stat (v1)
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:39:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220211103913.GR23216@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAM9d7cgPFLjQyopX04MwG6Leq6DwDJF2q6BxOL_Nw6J2LEZF4g@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 09:55:27PM -0800, Namhyung Kim wrote:

> So you are ok with adding two new tracepoints, even if they are
> similar to what we already have in lockdep/lock_stat, right?

Yeah, I don't think adding tracepoints to the slowpaths of the various
locks should be a problem.

      reply	other threads:[~2022-02-11 10:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-08 18:41 [RFC 00/12] locking: Separate lock tracepoints from lockdep/lock_stat (v1) Namhyung Kim
     [not found] ` <20220208184208.79303-1-namhyung-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2022-02-08 18:41   ` [PATCH 02/12] cgroup: rstat: Make cgroup_rstat_cpu_lock name readable Namhyung Kim
2022-02-08 18:46     ` Tejun Heo
     [not found]       ` <YgK6k4TXnRbm02dh-NiLfg/pYEd1N0TnZuCh8vA@public.gmane.org>
2022-02-08 19:16         ` Namhyung Kim
     [not found]           ` <CAM9d7cgKLycpFuXq0VgC=ADtAipXtKdfRcDqvZwMrNBz7hXd7A-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2022-02-08 23:51             ` Namhyung Kim
2022-02-08 19:14 ` [RFC 00/12] locking: Separate lock tracepoints from lockdep/lock_stat (v1) Namhyung Kim
2022-02-09  9:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-02-09 18:19   ` Waiman Long
     [not found]     ` <24fe6a08-5931-8e8d-8d77-459388c4654e-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2022-02-09 18:29       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-02-09 19:02         ` Waiman Long
     [not found]           ` <69e5f778-8715-4acf-c027-58b6ec4a9e77-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2022-02-09 19:17             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-02-09 19:37               ` Waiman Long
2022-02-09 19:22           ` Namhyung Kim
     [not found]             ` <CAM9d7ci=N2NVj57k=W0ebqBzfW+ThBqYSrx-CZbgwGcbOSrEGA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2022-02-09 19:28               ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-02-09 19:45                 ` Namhyung Kim
     [not found]                   ` <CAM9d7cj=tj6pA48q_wkQOGn-2vUc9FRj63bMBOm5R7OukmMbTQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2022-02-09 19:56                     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-02-09 20:17                     ` Waiman Long
2022-02-10  0:27                       ` Namhyung Kim
2022-02-10  2:12                         ` Waiman Long
2022-02-10  9:33                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-02-10  0:32   ` Namhyung Kim
     [not found]     ` <CAM9d7cgq+jxu6FJuKhZkprn7dO4DiG5pDjmYZzneQYTfKOM85g-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2022-02-10  9:13       ` Peter Zijlstra
     [not found]         ` <YgTXUQ9CBoo3+A+c-Nxj+rRp3nVydTX5a5knrm8zTDFooKrT+cvkQGrU6aU0@public.gmane.org>
2022-02-10 19:14           ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-02-10 19:27             ` Waiman Long
     [not found]               ` <52de2e14-33d9-bdda-4b37-3e72ae9954c7-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2022-02-10 20:10                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-02-11  5:57                   ` Namhyung Kim
2022-02-11  5:55           ` Namhyung Kim
2022-02-11 10:39             ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220211103913.GR23216@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=byungchul.park@lge.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=rburny@google.com \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox