From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shakeel Butt Subject: Re: [PATCH] memcg: provide reclaim stats via 'memory.reclaim' Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 05:08:35 +0000 Message-ID: <20220519050835.ebpiukexgiys6t57@google.com> References: <20220518223815.809858-1-vaibhav@linux.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:from:to :cc; bh=ssVw9Fz9ZtI8VSN2PnnCy16Ie6cjZqhXq7jkPcwK+VI=; b=p1NA6cOyXSw5ouGNdhysoNKwpC+u544fyrDYu0KRc2c2e3ge13jLIY2R6C9yI7FNxq lvhOpidQwLWrlHfaI75+qsSfVYwYmwzwxfCSsYuVmW20p+OGVFMJ11n4krPvP+4y4yQ3 ArzvvSz0qUdPdAjWkkkdSdgrgz6lcxZrq3hcwLXfVX1xbuRBis2dKkf871l1prfl+BVv o7GhGIaYR4wz+MT62Ioh36TOJ/bKjcTPUZdj+8zF3R3erlBHaKgbD6RpGxh8SAEJFC1I DBj+/pEpHKZXlI9DEH4YqWzNp7m8KXD40ml1jejz/hE/UOXcup3+tYdHpbBarswgdd+m TrBw== In-Reply-To: <20220518223815.809858-1-vaibhav@linux.ibm.com> List-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Vaibhav Jain Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Tejun Heo , Zefan Li , Johannes Weiner , Jonathan Corbet , Michal Hocko , Vladimir Davydov , Andrew Morton , "Aneesh Kumar K . V" , Yosry Ahmed On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 04:08:15AM +0530, Vaibhav Jain wrote: > [1] Provides a way for user-space to trigger proactive reclaim by introducing > a write-only memcg file 'memory.reclaim'. However reclaim stats like number > of pages scanned and reclaimed is still not directly available to the > user-space. > > This patch proposes to extend [1] to make the memcg file 'memory.reclaim' > readable which returns the number of pages scanned / reclaimed during the > reclaim process from 'struct vmpressure' associated with each memcg. This should > let user-space asses how successful proactive reclaim triggered from memcg > 'memory.reclaim' was ? > > With the patch following command flow is expected: > > # echo "1M" > memory.reclaim > > # cat memory.reclaim > scanned 76 > reclaimed 32 > Yosry already mentioned the race issue with the implementation and I would prefer we don't create any new dependency on vmpressure which I think we should deprecate. Anyways my question is how are you planning to use these metrics i.e. scanned & reclaimed? I wonder if the data you are interested in can be extracted without a stable interface. Have you tried BPF way to get these metrics? We already have a tracepoint in vmscan tracing the scanned and reclaimed.