public inbox for cgroups@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jiri Slaby (SUSE)" <jirislaby@kernel.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Jiri Slaby (SUSE)" <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
	Martin Liska <mliska@suse.cz>, Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] block/blk-iocost (gcc13): move large values to a new enum
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 12:21:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221213112148.15235-1-jirislaby@kernel.org> (raw)

Since gcc13, each member of an enum has the same type as the enum [1]. And
that is inherited from its members. Provided:
  VTIME_PER_SEC_SHIFT     = 37,
  VTIME_PER_SEC           = 1LLU << VTIME_PER_SEC_SHIFT,
the named type is unsigned long.

This generates warnings with gcc-13:
  block/blk-iocost.c: In function 'ioc_weight_prfill':
  block/blk-iocost.c:3037:37: error: format '%u' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'long unsigned int'

  block/blk-iocost.c: In function 'ioc_weight_show':
  block/blk-iocost.c:3047:34: error: format '%u' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'long unsigned int'

So move the large VTIME values away to a separate enum, so that they
don't affect other members. Move also VRATE ones as they depend on
VTIME.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36113

Cc: Martin Liska <mliska@suse.cz>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby (SUSE) <jirislaby@kernel.org>
---

Notes:
    [v2] move to a new enum

 block/blk-iocost.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-iocost.c b/block/blk-iocost.c
index d1bdc12deaa7..49d6e5aec3d5 100644
--- a/block/blk-iocost.c
+++ b/block/blk-iocost.c
@@ -233,29 +233,6 @@ enum {
 	/* 1/64k is granular enough and can easily be handled w/ u32 */
 	WEIGHT_ONE		= 1 << 16,
 
-	/*
-	 * As vtime is used to calculate the cost of each IO, it needs to
-	 * be fairly high precision.  For example, it should be able to
-	 * represent the cost of a single page worth of discard with
-	 * suffificient accuracy.  At the same time, it should be able to
-	 * represent reasonably long enough durations to be useful and
-	 * convenient during operation.
-	 *
-	 * 1s worth of vtime is 2^37.  This gives us both sub-nanosecond
-	 * granularity and days of wrap-around time even at extreme vrates.
-	 */
-	VTIME_PER_SEC_SHIFT	= 37,
-	VTIME_PER_SEC		= 1LLU << VTIME_PER_SEC_SHIFT,
-	VTIME_PER_USEC		= VTIME_PER_SEC / USEC_PER_SEC,
-	VTIME_PER_NSEC		= VTIME_PER_SEC / NSEC_PER_SEC,
-
-	/* bound vrate adjustments within two orders of magnitude */
-	VRATE_MIN_PPM		= 10000,	/* 1% */
-	VRATE_MAX_PPM		= 100000000,	/* 10000% */
-
-	VRATE_MIN		= VTIME_PER_USEC * VRATE_MIN_PPM / MILLION,
-	VRATE_CLAMP_ADJ_PCT	= 4,
-
 	/* if IOs end up waiting for requests, issue less */
 	RQ_WAIT_BUSY_PCT	= 5,
 
@@ -310,6 +287,31 @@ enum {
 	LCOEF_RANDIO_PAGES	= 4096,
 };
 
+enum {
+	/*
+	 * As vtime is used to calculate the cost of each IO, it needs to
+	 * be fairly high precision.  For example, it should be able to
+	 * represent the cost of a single page worth of discard with
+	 * suffificient accuracy.  At the same time, it should be able to
+	 * represent reasonably long enough durations to be useful and
+	 * convenient during operation.
+	 *
+	 * 1s worth of vtime is 2^37.  This gives us both sub-nanosecond
+	 * granularity and days of wrap-around time even at extreme vrates.
+	 */
+	VTIME_PER_SEC_SHIFT	= 37,
+	VTIME_PER_SEC		= 1LLU << VTIME_PER_SEC_SHIFT,
+	VTIME_PER_USEC		= VTIME_PER_SEC / USEC_PER_SEC,
+	VTIME_PER_NSEC		= VTIME_PER_SEC / NSEC_PER_SEC,
+
+	/* bound vrate adjustments within two orders of magnitude */
+	VRATE_MIN_PPM		= 10000,	/* 1% */
+	VRATE_MAX_PPM		= 100000000,	/* 10000% */
+
+	VRATE_MIN		= VTIME_PER_USEC * VRATE_MIN_PPM / MILLION,
+	VRATE_CLAMP_ADJ_PCT	= 4,
+};
+
 enum ioc_running {
 	IOC_IDLE,
 	IOC_RUNNING,
-- 
2.39.0


             reply	other threads:[~2022-12-13 11:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-13 11:21 Jiri Slaby (SUSE) [this message]
     [not found] ` <20221213112148.15235-1-jirislaby-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2022-12-13 11:55   ` [PATCH v2] block/blk-iocost (gcc13): move large values to a new enum Jiri Slaby

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221213112148.15235-1-jirislaby@kernel.org \
    --to=jirislaby@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mliska@suse.cz \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox