From: "Jiri Slaby (SUSE)" <jirislaby@kernel.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Jiri Slaby (SUSE)" <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
Martin Liska <mliska@suse.cz>, Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] block/blk-iocost (gcc13): move large values to a new enum
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 12:21:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221213112148.15235-1-jirislaby@kernel.org> (raw)
Since gcc13, each member of an enum has the same type as the enum [1]. And
that is inherited from its members. Provided:
VTIME_PER_SEC_SHIFT = 37,
VTIME_PER_SEC = 1LLU << VTIME_PER_SEC_SHIFT,
the named type is unsigned long.
This generates warnings with gcc-13:
block/blk-iocost.c: In function 'ioc_weight_prfill':
block/blk-iocost.c:3037:37: error: format '%u' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'long unsigned int'
block/blk-iocost.c: In function 'ioc_weight_show':
block/blk-iocost.c:3047:34: error: format '%u' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'long unsigned int'
So move the large VTIME values away to a separate enum, so that they
don't affect other members. Move also VRATE ones as they depend on
VTIME.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36113
Cc: Martin Liska <mliska@suse.cz>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby (SUSE) <jirislaby@kernel.org>
---
Notes:
[v2] move to a new enum
block/blk-iocost.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-iocost.c b/block/blk-iocost.c
index d1bdc12deaa7..49d6e5aec3d5 100644
--- a/block/blk-iocost.c
+++ b/block/blk-iocost.c
@@ -233,29 +233,6 @@ enum {
/* 1/64k is granular enough and can easily be handled w/ u32 */
WEIGHT_ONE = 1 << 16,
- /*
- * As vtime is used to calculate the cost of each IO, it needs to
- * be fairly high precision. For example, it should be able to
- * represent the cost of a single page worth of discard with
- * suffificient accuracy. At the same time, it should be able to
- * represent reasonably long enough durations to be useful and
- * convenient during operation.
- *
- * 1s worth of vtime is 2^37. This gives us both sub-nanosecond
- * granularity and days of wrap-around time even at extreme vrates.
- */
- VTIME_PER_SEC_SHIFT = 37,
- VTIME_PER_SEC = 1LLU << VTIME_PER_SEC_SHIFT,
- VTIME_PER_USEC = VTIME_PER_SEC / USEC_PER_SEC,
- VTIME_PER_NSEC = VTIME_PER_SEC / NSEC_PER_SEC,
-
- /* bound vrate adjustments within two orders of magnitude */
- VRATE_MIN_PPM = 10000, /* 1% */
- VRATE_MAX_PPM = 100000000, /* 10000% */
-
- VRATE_MIN = VTIME_PER_USEC * VRATE_MIN_PPM / MILLION,
- VRATE_CLAMP_ADJ_PCT = 4,
-
/* if IOs end up waiting for requests, issue less */
RQ_WAIT_BUSY_PCT = 5,
@@ -310,6 +287,31 @@ enum {
LCOEF_RANDIO_PAGES = 4096,
};
+enum {
+ /*
+ * As vtime is used to calculate the cost of each IO, it needs to
+ * be fairly high precision. For example, it should be able to
+ * represent the cost of a single page worth of discard with
+ * suffificient accuracy. At the same time, it should be able to
+ * represent reasonably long enough durations to be useful and
+ * convenient during operation.
+ *
+ * 1s worth of vtime is 2^37. This gives us both sub-nanosecond
+ * granularity and days of wrap-around time even at extreme vrates.
+ */
+ VTIME_PER_SEC_SHIFT = 37,
+ VTIME_PER_SEC = 1LLU << VTIME_PER_SEC_SHIFT,
+ VTIME_PER_USEC = VTIME_PER_SEC / USEC_PER_SEC,
+ VTIME_PER_NSEC = VTIME_PER_SEC / NSEC_PER_SEC,
+
+ /* bound vrate adjustments within two orders of magnitude */
+ VRATE_MIN_PPM = 10000, /* 1% */
+ VRATE_MAX_PPM = 100000000, /* 10000% */
+
+ VRATE_MIN = VTIME_PER_USEC * VRATE_MIN_PPM / MILLION,
+ VRATE_CLAMP_ADJ_PCT = 4,
+};
+
enum ioc_running {
IOC_IDLE,
IOC_RUNNING,
--
2.39.0
next reply other threads:[~2022-12-13 11:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-13 11:21 Jiri Slaby (SUSE) [this message]
[not found] ` <20221213112148.15235-1-jirislaby-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2022-12-13 11:55 ` [PATCH v2] block/blk-iocost (gcc13): move large values to a new enum Jiri Slaby
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221213112148.15235-1-jirislaby@kernel.org \
--to=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mliska@suse.cz \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox