From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Zefan Li <lizefan.x@bytedance.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Mrunal Patel <mpatel@redhat.com>,
Ryan Phillips <rphillips@redhat.com>,
Brent Rowsell <browsell@redhat.com>,
Peter Hunt <pehunt@redhat.com>, Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/9] cgroup/cpuset: Improve temporary cpumasks handling
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2023 20:55:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230627005529.1564984-4-longman@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230627005529.1564984-1-longman@redhat.com>
The limitation that update_parent_subparts_cpumask() can only use
addmask & delmask in the given tmp cpumasks is fragile and may lead to
unexpected error.
Fix this problem by allocating/freeing a struct tmpmasks in
update_cpumask() to avoid reusing the cpumasks in trial_cs.
With this change, we can move the update_tasks_cpumask() for the
parent and update_sibling_cpumasks() for the sibling to inside
update_parent_subparts_cpumask().
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
---
kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 42 +++++++++++++-----------------------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
index ade33e50ffe2..b8ccc1be7bde 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
@@ -1277,6 +1277,8 @@ enum subparts_cmd {
static int update_flag(cpuset_flagbits_t bit, struct cpuset *cs,
int turning_on);
+static void update_sibling_cpumasks(struct cpuset *parent, struct cpuset *cs,
+ struct tmpmasks *tmp);
/*
* Update partition exclusive flag
@@ -1447,7 +1449,7 @@ static int update_parent_subparts_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, int cmd,
adding = cpumask_andnot(tmp->addmask, tmp->addmask,
parent->subparts_cpus);
/*
- * Empty cpumask is not allewed
+ * Empty cpumask is not allowed
*/
if (cpumask_empty(newmask)) {
part_error = PERR_CPUSEMPTY;
@@ -1567,8 +1569,11 @@ static int update_parent_subparts_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, int cmd,
spin_unlock_irq(&callback_lock);
- if (adding || deleting)
+ if (adding || deleting) {
update_tasks_cpumask(parent, tmp->addmask);
+ if (parent->child_ecpus_count)
+ update_sibling_cpumasks(parent, cs, tmp);
+ }
/*
* For partcmd_update without newmask, it is being called from
@@ -1842,18 +1847,8 @@ static int update_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *trialcs,
if (cpumask_equal(cs->cpus_allowed, trialcs->cpus_allowed))
return 0;
-#ifdef CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK
- /*
- * Use the cpumasks in trialcs for tmpmasks when they are pointers
- * to allocated cpumasks.
- *
- * Note that update_parent_subparts_cpumask() uses only addmask &
- * delmask, but not new_cpus.
- */
- tmp.addmask = trialcs->subparts_cpus;
- tmp.delmask = trialcs->effective_cpus;
- tmp.new_cpus = NULL;
-#endif
+ if (alloc_cpumasks(NULL, &tmp))
+ return -ENOMEM;
retval = validate_change(cs, trialcs);
@@ -1882,7 +1877,7 @@ static int update_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *trialcs,
retval = 0;
}
if (retval < 0)
- return retval;
+ goto out_free;
if (cs->partition_root_state) {
if (invalidate)
@@ -1917,11 +1912,6 @@ static int update_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *trialcs,
}
spin_unlock_irq(&callback_lock);
-#ifdef CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK
- /* Now trialcs->cpus_allowed is available */
- tmp.new_cpus = trialcs->cpus_allowed;
-#endif
-
/* effective_cpus will be updated here */
update_cpumasks_hier(cs, &tmp, false);
@@ -1938,6 +1928,8 @@ static int update_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *trialcs,
/* Update CS_SCHED_LOAD_BALANCE and/or sched_domains */
update_partition_sd_lb(cs, old_prs);
}
+out_free:
+ free_cpumasks(NULL, &tmp);
return 0;
}
@@ -2346,13 +2338,11 @@ static int update_prstate(struct cpuset *cs, int new_prs)
err = update_parent_subparts_cpumask(cs, partcmd_enable,
NULL, &tmpmask);
- if (err)
- goto out;
} else if (old_prs && new_prs) {
/*
* A change in load balance state only, no change in cpumasks.
*/
- goto out;
+ ;
} else {
/*
* Switching back to member is always allowed even if it
@@ -2372,12 +2362,6 @@ static int update_prstate(struct cpuset *cs, int new_prs)
spin_unlock_irq(&callback_lock);
}
}
-
- update_tasks_cpumask(parent, tmpmask.new_cpus);
-
- if (parent->child_ecpus_count)
- update_sibling_cpumasks(parent, cs, &tmpmask);
-
out:
/*
* Make partition invalid & disable CS_CPU_EXCLUSIVE if an error
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-27 0:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-27 0:55 [PATCH v3 0/9] cgroup/cpuset: Support remote partitions Waiman Long
2023-06-27 0:55 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] cgroup/cpuset: Inherit parent's load balance state in v2 Waiman Long
[not found] ` <20230627005529.1564984-1-longman-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2023-06-27 0:55 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] cgroup/cpuset: Extract out CS_CPU_EXCLUSIVE & CS_SCHED_LOAD_BALANCE handling Waiman Long
2023-06-27 0:55 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] cgroup/cpuset: Add cpuset.cpus.exclusive for v2 Waiman Long
2023-06-27 4:12 ` kernel test robot
[not found] ` <20230627005529.1564984-6-longman-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2023-06-27 8:21 ` kernel test robot
2023-06-27 0:55 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] cgroup/cpuset: Check partition conflict with housekeeping setup Waiman Long
2023-06-27 0:55 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] cgroup/cpuset: Documentation update for partition Waiman Long
2023-06-27 0:55 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] cgroup/cpuset: Extend test_cpuset_prs.sh to test remote partition Waiman Long
2023-06-27 0:55 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2023-06-27 0:55 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] cgroup/cpuset: Allow suppression of sched domain rebuild in update_cpumasks_hier() Waiman Long
2023-06-27 0:55 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] cgroup/cpuset: Introduce remote partition Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230627005529.1564984-4-longman@redhat.com \
--to=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=browsell@redhat.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan.x@bytedance.com \
--cc=mpatel@redhat.com \
--cc=pauld@redhat.com \
--cc=pehunt@redhat.com \
--cc=rphillips@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox