From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Zefan Li <lizefan.x@bytedance.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Hunt <pehunt@redhat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/5] workqueue: Make workqueue_set_unbound_cpumask() static
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 22:34:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231116033405.185166-2-longman@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231116033405.185166-1-longman@redhat.com>
The workqueue_set_unbound_cpumask() function is only used inside
workqueue.c with CONFIG_SYSFS. Make it static and move it down to
within the ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS block. Also move apply_wqattrs_lock()
and apply_wqattrs_unlock() down as all their callers are within the
CONFIG_SYSFS block.
Also mark workqueue_apply_unbound_cpumask() as __maybe_unused for now as
it will be used by another function introduced in a later commit. There
is no functional change.
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
---
include/linux/workqueue.h | 1 -
kernel/workqueue.c | 102 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/workqueue.h b/include/linux/workqueue.h
index 24b1e5070f4d..cf49b467bd57 100644
--- a/include/linux/workqueue.h
+++ b/include/linux/workqueue.h
@@ -491,7 +491,6 @@ struct workqueue_attrs *alloc_workqueue_attrs(void);
void free_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_attrs *attrs);
int apply_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
const struct workqueue_attrs *attrs);
-int workqueue_set_unbound_cpumask(cpumask_var_t cpumask);
extern bool queue_work_on(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
struct work_struct *work);
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 6e578f576a6f..145159f993e9 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -4411,19 +4411,6 @@ static void apply_wqattrs_commit(struct apply_wqattrs_ctx *ctx)
mutex_unlock(&ctx->wq->mutex);
}
-static void apply_wqattrs_lock(void)
-{
- /* CPUs should stay stable across pwq creations and installations */
- cpus_read_lock();
- mutex_lock(&wq_pool_mutex);
-}
-
-static void apply_wqattrs_unlock(void)
-{
- mutex_unlock(&wq_pool_mutex);
- cpus_read_unlock();
-}
-
static int apply_workqueue_attrs_locked(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
const struct workqueue_attrs *attrs)
{
@@ -5784,7 +5771,7 @@ void thaw_workqueues(void)
}
#endif /* CONFIG_FREEZER */
-static int workqueue_apply_unbound_cpumask(const cpumask_var_t unbound_cpumask)
+static int __maybe_unused workqueue_apply_unbound_cpumask(const cpumask_var_t unbound_cpumask)
{
LIST_HEAD(ctxs);
int ret = 0;
@@ -5827,43 +5814,6 @@ static int workqueue_apply_unbound_cpumask(const cpumask_var_t unbound_cpumask)
return ret;
}
-/**
- * workqueue_set_unbound_cpumask - Set the low-level unbound cpumask
- * @cpumask: the cpumask to set
- *
- * The low-level workqueues cpumask is a global cpumask that limits
- * the affinity of all unbound workqueues. This function check the @cpumask
- * and apply it to all unbound workqueues and updates all pwqs of them.
- *
- * Return: 0 - Success
- * -EINVAL - Invalid @cpumask
- * -ENOMEM - Failed to allocate memory for attrs or pwqs.
- */
-int workqueue_set_unbound_cpumask(cpumask_var_t cpumask)
-{
- int ret = -EINVAL;
-
- /*
- * Not excluding isolated cpus on purpose.
- * If the user wishes to include them, we allow that.
- */
- cpumask_and(cpumask, cpumask, cpu_possible_mask);
- if (!cpumask_empty(cpumask)) {
- apply_wqattrs_lock();
- if (cpumask_equal(cpumask, wq_unbound_cpumask)) {
- ret = 0;
- goto out_unlock;
- }
-
- ret = workqueue_apply_unbound_cpumask(cpumask);
-
-out_unlock:
- apply_wqattrs_unlock();
- }
-
- return ret;
-}
-
static int parse_affn_scope(const char *val)
{
int i;
@@ -5982,6 +5932,19 @@ static struct attribute *wq_sysfs_attrs[] = {
};
ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(wq_sysfs);
+static void apply_wqattrs_lock(void)
+{
+ /* CPUs should stay stable across pwq creations and installations */
+ cpus_read_lock();
+ mutex_lock(&wq_pool_mutex);
+}
+
+static void apply_wqattrs_unlock(void)
+{
+ mutex_unlock(&wq_pool_mutex);
+ cpus_read_unlock();
+}
+
static ssize_t wq_nice_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
char *buf)
{
@@ -6158,6 +6121,43 @@ static struct bus_type wq_subsys = {
.dev_groups = wq_sysfs_groups,
};
+/**
+ * workqueue_set_unbound_cpumask - Set the low-level unbound cpumask
+ * @cpumask: the cpumask to set
+ *
+ * The low-level workqueues cpumask is a global cpumask that limits
+ * the affinity of all unbound workqueues. This function check the @cpumask
+ * and apply it to all unbound workqueues and updates all pwqs of them.
+ *
+ * Return: 0 - Success
+ * -EINVAL - Invalid @cpumask
+ * -ENOMEM - Failed to allocate memory for attrs or pwqs.
+ */
+static int workqueue_set_unbound_cpumask(cpumask_var_t cpumask)
+{
+ int ret = -EINVAL;
+
+ /*
+ * Not excluding isolated cpus on purpose.
+ * If the user wishes to include them, we allow that.
+ */
+ cpumask_and(cpumask, cpumask, cpu_possible_mask);
+ if (!cpumask_empty(cpumask)) {
+ apply_wqattrs_lock();
+ if (cpumask_equal(cpumask, wq_unbound_cpumask)) {
+ ret = 0;
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
+
+ ret = workqueue_apply_unbound_cpumask(cpumask);
+
+out_unlock:
+ apply_wqattrs_unlock();
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
static ssize_t wq_unbound_cpumask_show(struct device *dev,
struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
{
--
2.39.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-16 3:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-16 3:34 [PATCH v4 0/5] cgroup/cpuset: Improve CPU isolation in isolated partitions Waiman Long
2023-11-16 3:34 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2023-11-16 3:34 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] workqueue: Add workqueue_unbound_exclude_cpumask() to exclude CPUs from wq_unbound_cpumask Waiman Long
2023-11-16 3:34 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] selftests/cgroup: Minor code cleanup and reorganization of test_cpuset_prs.sh Waiman Long
2023-11-16 3:34 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] cgroup/cpuset: Keep track of CPUs in isolated partitions Waiman Long
2023-11-16 3:34 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] cgroup/cpuset: Take isolated CPUs out of workqueue unbound cpumask Waiman Long
2023-11-19 15:23 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] cgroup/cpuset: Improve CPU isolation in isolated partitions Tejun Heo
2023-11-20 17:52 ` Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231116033405.185166-2-longman@redhat.com \
--to=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan.x@bytedance.com \
--cc=pehunt@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox