From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="eONjVomh" Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21663C8 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2023 18:19:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1700533143; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nedYr642nEg/r1pmego4Hp5PjxqjOd5QuDOx28RV/Z4=; b=eONjVomhyR6i7726RIwSPwn3crZYkd4N5r5yPpjpJcPODT33KNDCtqAU+8cj2QS1a1fQYN Ld8+aI2xxSmFtH6vVdtjg1hyC6/2XIq4HYuYSzXBOx9ocMfJdP/bHzpoe/owA3iUCotWy9 btJjJeplLJ+q2JHmdKpY2uBucqz0tM8= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-586-iYHo0YeKP32831Ej1aXyEg-1; Mon, 20 Nov 2023 21:19:00 -0500 X-MC-Unique: iYHo0YeKP32831Ej1aXyEg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.7]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D36485A58C; Tue, 21 Nov 2023 02:18:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from llong.com (unknown [10.22.8.109]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26E9E1C060B0; Tue, 21 Nov 2023 02:18:59 +0000 (UTC) From: Waiman Long To: Tejun Heo , Lai Jiangshan Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Waiman Long , kernel test robot Subject: [PATCH-cgroup] workqueue: Move workqueue_set_unbound_cpumask() and its helpers inside CONFIG_SYSFS Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2023 21:18:40 -0500 Message-Id: <20231121021840.10937-1-longman@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: cgroups@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.7 Commit fe28f631fa94 ("workqueue: Add workqueue_unbound_exclude_cpumask() to exclude CPUs from wq_unbound_cpumask") makes workqueue_set_unbound_cpumask() static as it is not used elsewhere in the kernel. However, this triggers a kernel test robot warning about 'workqueue_set_unbound_cpumask' defined but not used when CONFIG_SYS isn't defined. It happens that workqueue_set_unbound_cpumask() is only called when CONFIG_SYS is defined. Move workqueue_set_unbound_cpumask() and its helpers inside the CONFIG_SYSFS compilation block to avoid the warning. There is no functional change. Fixes: fe28f631fa94 ("workqueue: Add workqueue_unbound_exclude_cpumask() to exclude CPUs from wq_unbound_cpumask") Reported-by: kernel test robot Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202311130831.uh0AoCd1-lkp@intel.com/ Signed-off-by: Waiman Long --- kernel/workqueue.c | 102 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c index bd9d34eacd78..2fc585d3d6ca 100644 --- a/kernel/workqueue.c +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c @@ -4417,19 +4417,6 @@ static void apply_wqattrs_commit(struct apply_wqattrs_ctx *ctx) mutex_unlock(&ctx->wq->mutex); } -static void apply_wqattrs_lock(void) -{ - /* CPUs should stay stable across pwq creations and installations */ - cpus_read_lock(); - mutex_lock(&wq_pool_mutex); -} - -static void apply_wqattrs_unlock(void) -{ - mutex_unlock(&wq_pool_mutex); - cpus_read_unlock(); -} - static int apply_workqueue_attrs_locked(struct workqueue_struct *wq, const struct workqueue_attrs *attrs) { @@ -5833,44 +5820,6 @@ static int workqueue_apply_unbound_cpumask(const cpumask_var_t unbound_cpumask) return ret; } -/** - * workqueue_set_unbound_cpumask - Set the low-level unbound cpumask - * @cpumask: the cpumask to set - * - * The low-level workqueues cpumask is a global cpumask that limits - * the affinity of all unbound workqueues. This function check the @cpumask - * and apply it to all unbound workqueues and updates all pwqs of them. - * - * Return: 0 - Success - * -EINVAL - Invalid @cpumask - * -ENOMEM - Failed to allocate memory for attrs or pwqs. - */ -static int workqueue_set_unbound_cpumask(cpumask_var_t cpumask) -{ - int ret = -EINVAL; - - /* - * Not excluding isolated cpus on purpose. - * If the user wishes to include them, we allow that. - */ - cpumask_and(cpumask, cpumask, cpu_possible_mask); - if (!cpumask_empty(cpumask)) { - apply_wqattrs_lock(); - cpumask_copy(wq_requested_unbound_cpumask, cpumask); - if (cpumask_equal(cpumask, wq_unbound_cpumask)) { - ret = 0; - goto out_unlock; - } - - ret = workqueue_apply_unbound_cpumask(cpumask); - -out_unlock: - apply_wqattrs_unlock(); - } - - return ret; -} - /** * workqueue_unbound_exclude_cpumask - Exclude given CPUs from unbound cpumask * @exclude_cpumask: the cpumask to be excluded from wq_unbound_cpumask @@ -6027,6 +5976,19 @@ static struct attribute *wq_sysfs_attrs[] = { }; ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(wq_sysfs); +static void apply_wqattrs_lock(void) +{ + /* CPUs should stay stable across pwq creations and installations */ + cpus_read_lock(); + mutex_lock(&wq_pool_mutex); +} + +static void apply_wqattrs_unlock(void) +{ + mutex_unlock(&wq_pool_mutex); + cpus_read_unlock(); +} + static ssize_t wq_nice_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) { @@ -6203,6 +6165,44 @@ static struct bus_type wq_subsys = { .dev_groups = wq_sysfs_groups, }; +/** + * workqueue_set_unbound_cpumask - Set the low-level unbound cpumask + * @cpumask: the cpumask to set + * + * The low-level workqueues cpumask is a global cpumask that limits + * the affinity of all unbound workqueues. This function check the @cpumask + * and apply it to all unbound workqueues and updates all pwqs of them. + * + * Return: 0 - Success + * -EINVAL - Invalid @cpumask + * -ENOMEM - Failed to allocate memory for attrs or pwqs. + */ +static int workqueue_set_unbound_cpumask(cpumask_var_t cpumask) +{ + int ret = -EINVAL; + + /* + * Not excluding isolated cpus on purpose. + * If the user wishes to include them, we allow that. + */ + cpumask_and(cpumask, cpumask, cpu_possible_mask); + if (!cpumask_empty(cpumask)) { + apply_wqattrs_lock(); + cpumask_copy(wq_requested_unbound_cpumask, cpumask); + if (cpumask_equal(cpumask, wq_unbound_cpumask)) { + ret = 0; + goto out_unlock; + } + + ret = workqueue_apply_unbound_cpumask(cpumask); + +out_unlock: + apply_wqattrs_unlock(); + } + + return ret; +} + static ssize_t __wq_cpumask_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf, cpumask_var_t mask) { -- 2.39.3