From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 707E94F5F2; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 17:33:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux-foundation.org header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.b="USgwQzTa" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 86921C433CD; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 17:33:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1701279223; bh=zQQtQnUHucJiwN/RgIyJnqMuBd9OdTTF4L4XnghdVhM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=USgwQzTaJOoS5e7xNqNJZYaQJgsm4DYEqgxPQkGiNGMQ9bYiU3rSdOdAKhOorK1Hd sAF10PwyYmAceKrI9fZfeEGjxvuXj5AeqWrKzr3UgzpHW5OEj9eoWAUJDn5MUd/7YU H8TJCT5AxiHc68DVNQc+hjedUEZDe8Tczed+byys= Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 09:33:41 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Dmitry Rokosov Cc: Michal Hocko , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] mm: memcg: introduce new event to trace shrink_memcg Message-Id: <20231129093341.02605a16142fc3e04384c52e@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20231129152057.x7fhbcvwtsmkbdpb@CAB-WSD-L081021> References: <20231123193937.11628-1-ddrokosov@salutedevices.com> <20231123193937.11628-3-ddrokosov@salutedevices.com> <20231127113644.btg2xrcpjhq4cdgu@CAB-WSD-L081021> <20231127161637.5eqxk7xjhhyr5tj4@CAB-WSD-L081021> <20231129152057.x7fhbcvwtsmkbdpb@CAB-WSD-L081021> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.8.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: cgroups@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 18:20:57 +0300 Dmitry Rokosov wrote: > Okay, I will try to prepare a new patch version with memcg printing from > lruvec and slab tracepoints. > > Then Andrew should drop the previous patchsets, I suppose. Please advise > on the correct workflow steps here. This series is present in mm.git's mm-unstable branch. Note "unstable". So dropping the v3 series and merging v4 is totally not a problem. It's why this branch exists - it's daily rebasing, in high flux. When a patchset is considered stabilized and ready, I'll move it into the mm-stable branch, which is (supposed to be) the non-rebasing tree for next merge window. If you have small fixes then I prefer little fixup patches against what is presently in mm-unstable. If you send replacement patches then no problem, I'll check to see whether I should turn them into little fixup deltas. I prefer little fixups so that people can see what has changed, so I can see which review/test issues were addressed and so that people don't feel a need to re-review the whole patchset. If generation of little fixups is impractical, I'll drop the old series entirely and I'll merge the new one. Each case is a judgement call, please send whatever you think makes most sense given the above.