From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF58019CCFA for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2025 16:31:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741019476; cv=none; b=lbTe+yFF9qa2Rv5TdTGcNxYkTCxahMlXJMMXF8cbjEmDnj1csGpwt15k5wktqUh5hmIQWAXDWz5ODtG/ieSrxhvV2IOVrGKsq1ckQfErUWH7eIBqdW6RSfMNT8Mm537sYX+A80ARv5C8gG9l9bRVOhxe/XHW2ETHPM7TmhDPBL4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741019476; c=relaxed/simple; bh=cTe4VsxVSEBfasQmvi03CXqpkl+gzCOnVs4Cfv//8Bo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=PfWzXRknSdarCtiCIqp9lJvj031xwR/dWJNRHH9Ho2OyAvhuFrykJoCt6juPuVDFw2lHjwiSMJKh4vlVLd//SowwxIzCC12gCE2D6SVWShhoQhqdKlEqnjef7YpaeBH3Z/u5PWPnJmLbnrB+wYJlgh2kS8y1HbWdj1VdLTREI5M= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=IyzNEvZ2; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="IyzNEvZ2" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1741019474; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=d6h5undxasqJ0N3FiNJqqgjSewvjkbEXc2mo8LWFs/U=; b=IyzNEvZ2U7hpwZ1wKGzdLV0TLxQJODF3lYKTQlGohpjojDYwUCyBOxKK4t6U+Ep5oi/Gq4 axBSC7wjtG3LQDsAdZKJx7rwLkfQBtLl0xh9xs+aKeAUnJRimGEm/N2c13HIGQFwlEWstP KjKqcU9DWfVXKwIkPg48r/WPPY6zi/w= Received: from mail-wm1-f70.google.com (mail-wm1-f70.google.com [209.85.128.70]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-204-ZhdZ2bkONvGcM_yayBH9iA-1; Mon, 03 Mar 2025 11:31:01 -0500 X-MC-Unique: ZhdZ2bkONvGcM_yayBH9iA-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: ZhdZ2bkONvGcM_yayBH9iA_1741019460 Received: by mail-wm1-f70.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-43bc5a18c52so4622985e9.3 for ; Mon, 03 Mar 2025 08:31:01 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1741019460; x=1741624260; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=d6h5undxasqJ0N3FiNJqqgjSewvjkbEXc2mo8LWFs/U=; b=C4hzVXa6IOpo0C7Deqy/CPklR0THCwlwjU2sx7Xrr3roqtOA9HYoeVxKpwMJydBOCz NgkQT2y0Dhy9m9NRJVe47hu1mcbDM1D6JUSbTQ9dacc19a3IRUk4BPVzj64najY12nf9 TQ0Be6wYtiQt8CQ9i1P61ptFdkzz9s1k7juSHwUzL+oEsmHytaYegIjxN7fZDS8qEjHr nChb21alN21dTwa8Gi2JgYrYrFkvYXKlqUJC7GyxxVMmeJ16cjrUwCziElJlGuPWJnj4 2h0XLrkN1DbAopp3K43bLbxRTFh9x6Zh4vaaCsQgZYhKTHUKaGJvl0F0DqE4SuSl+FZy jjVA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVZyKCd7yBn8M4tOtxswoVnH5TScjAMqQLE6QLIf4Vl7pUVL5Ytzz8tn/LDPaxJurgojjEdkQBl@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyqFjlJ6KDcSMkvuVCqK+2MJFeK7qE9UPuchcASNO+PavTMwf1q ZO1EaN/KVESo+iLoSSq8DI31LDLaPLxbHT7amj+kQYM55z+HwwfkpYAwmh4qVsvEE9pUnqGJ37w 6XGYoOvsCP34fHTsdocWlTCu0b1v5Q6AOFLxLwp3a4Q2NIUBss/ZgNDU= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncteOSixK4miVwinAnLvFYwiHMJJ8JfqIus1tSobAsThhjybZq6Z7c7vklXojg0 vxqOnl286TLariewp2szYRchBHtWTRxVdtThLvxvEvYoVjCO2qDBEMvuScnpXtwHM+nGQ0Zou7O HVSqnH09XJxYRf7mHIOE3G/MHspSnDfZK9vqcyDRB3gEvi9HK32aMNplVRibEw8A7goJ5gFE2xb VXfMse3GpppEDF4ABPXdQ8uaUa5kP+5SCGDi8AJbSXPBlZAWVhMkZQ0X+4Qkb+PYdD3aoBer4QZ kVOBN4DkJr75d4etJIHLkvQwyLynAPNbttOlNjhCVViEKAfQLrzV85yf3UK3q+pQiltpWkc5U61 U X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1387:b0:439:a138:20 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-43ba675d737mr104551545e9.20.1741019460128; Mon, 03 Mar 2025 08:31:00 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF077jzHsKl488EfYl1BqdHJTJ6b3kDjSKQKMSwBjouvZD2J29Qu4rXpeiVOA7Tvc80mUiuyg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1387:b0:439:a138:20 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-43ba675d737mr104551065e9.20.1741019459654; Mon, 03 Mar 2025 08:30:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (p200300cbc7349600af274326a2162bfb.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:cb:c734:9600:af27:4326:a216:2bfb]) by smtp.gmail.com with UTF8SMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-43bca3df658sm4293845e9.9.2025.03.03.08.30.58 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 03 Mar 2025 08:30:59 -0800 (PST) From: David Hildenbrand To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, David Hildenbrand , Andrew Morton , "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" , Tejun Heo , Zefan Li , Johannes Weiner , =?UTF-8?q?Michal=20Koutn=C3=BD?= , Jonathan Corbet , Andy Lutomirski , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , Muchun Song , "Liam R. Howlett" , Lorenzo Stoakes , Vlastimil Babka , Jann Horn Subject: [PATCH v3 19/20] fs/proc/task_mmu: remove per-page mapcount dependency for smaps/smaps_rollup (CONFIG_NO_PAGE_MAPCOUNT) Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 17:30:12 +0100 Message-ID: <20250303163014.1128035-20-david@redhat.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.48.1 In-Reply-To: <20250303163014.1128035-1-david@redhat.com> References: <20250303163014.1128035-1-david@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: cgroups@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Let's implement an alternative when per-page mapcounts in large folios are no longer maintained -- soon with CONFIG_NO_PAGE_MAPCOUNT. When computing the output for smaps / smaps_rollups, in particular when calculating the USS (Unique Set Size) and the PSS (Proportional Set Size), we still rely on per-page mapcounts. To determine private vs. shared, we'll use folio_likely_mapped_shared(), similar to how we handle PM_MMAP_EXCLUSIVE. Similarly, we might now under-estimate the USS and count pages towards "shared" that are actually "private" ("exclusively mapped"). When calculating the PSS, we'll now also use the average per-page mapcount for large folios: this can result in both, an over-estimation and an under-estimation of the PSS. The difference is not expected to matter much in practice, but we'll have to learn as we go. We can now provide folio_precise_page_mapcount() only with CONFIG_PAGE_MAPCOUNT, and remove one of the last users of per-page mapcounts when CONFIG_NO_PAGE_MAPCOUNT is enabled. Document the new behavior. Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand --- Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst | 22 +++++++++++++++++++--- fs/proc/internal.h | 8 ++++++++ fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 17 +++++++++++++++-- 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst index 1aa190017f796..c9e62e8e0685e 100644 --- a/Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst @@ -502,9 +502,25 @@ process, its PSS will be 1500. "Pss_Dirty" is the portion of PSS which consists of dirty pages. ("Pss_Clean" is not included, but it can be calculated by subtracting "Pss_Dirty" from "Pss".) -Note that even a page which is part of a MAP_SHARED mapping, but has only -a single pte mapped, i.e. is currently used by only one process, is accounted -as private and not as shared. +Traditionally, a page is accounted as "private" if it is mapped exactly once, +and a page is accounted as "shared" when mapped multiple times, even when +mapped in the same process multiple times. Note that this accounting is +independent of MAP_SHARED. + +In some kernel configurations, the semantics of pages part of a larger +allocation (e.g., THP) can differ: a page is accounted as "private" if all +pages part of the corresponding large allocation are *certainly* mapped in the +same process, even if the page is mapped multiple times in that process. A +page is accounted as "shared" if any page page of the larger allocation +is *maybe* mapped in a different process. In some cases, a large allocation +might be treated as "maybe mapped by multiple processes" even though this +is no longer the case. + +Some kernel configurations do not track the precise number of times a page part +of a larger allocation is mapped. In this case, when calculating the PSS, the +average number of mappings per page in this larger allocation might be used +as an approximation for the number of mappings of a page. The PSS calculation +will be imprecise in this case. "Referenced" indicates the amount of memory currently marked as referenced or accessed. diff --git a/fs/proc/internal.h b/fs/proc/internal.h index 96ea58e843114..8c921bc8652d9 100644 --- a/fs/proc/internal.h +++ b/fs/proc/internal.h @@ -143,6 +143,7 @@ unsigned name_to_int(const struct qstr *qstr); /* Worst case buffer size needed for holding an integer. */ #define PROC_NUMBUF 13 +#ifdef CONFIG_PAGE_MAPCOUNT /** * folio_precise_page_mapcount() - Number of mappings of this folio page. * @folio: The folio. @@ -173,6 +174,13 @@ static inline int folio_precise_page_mapcount(struct folio *folio, return mapcount; } +#else /* !CONFIG_PAGE_MAPCOUNT */ +static inline int folio_precise_page_mapcount(struct folio *folio, + struct page *page) +{ + BUILD_BUG(); +} +#endif /* CONFIG_PAGE_MAPCOUNT */ /** * folio_average_page_mapcount() - Average number of mappings per page in this diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c index 5043376ebd476..061f16b767118 100644 --- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c +++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c @@ -707,6 +707,8 @@ static void smaps_account(struct mem_size_stats *mss, struct page *page, struct folio *folio = page_folio(page); int i, nr = compound ? compound_nr(page) : 1; unsigned long size = nr * PAGE_SIZE; + bool exclusive; + int mapcount; /* * First accumulate quantities that depend only on |size| and the type @@ -747,18 +749,29 @@ static void smaps_account(struct mem_size_stats *mss, struct page *page, dirty, locked, present); return; } + + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NO_PAGE_MAPCOUNT)) { + mapcount = folio_average_page_mapcount(folio); + exclusive = !folio_maybe_mapped_shared(folio); + } + /* * We obtain a snapshot of the mapcount. Without holding the folio lock * this snapshot can be slightly wrong as we cannot always read the * mapcount atomically. */ for (i = 0; i < nr; i++, page++) { - int mapcount = folio_precise_page_mapcount(folio, page); unsigned long pss = PAGE_SIZE << PSS_SHIFT; + + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PAGE_MAPCOUNT)) { + mapcount = folio_precise_page_mapcount(folio, page); + exclusive = mapcount < 2; + } + if (mapcount >= 2) pss /= mapcount; smaps_page_accumulate(mss, folio, PAGE_SIZE, pss, - dirty, locked, mapcount < 2); + dirty, locked, exclusive); } } -- 2.48.1